Page 8 - The Importance of Common Metrics for Advacing Social Science Theory and Research
P. 8

The Importance of Common Metrics for Advancing Social Science Theory and Research: A Workshop Summary
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13034.html

            viii                                                     PREFACE

            University  of  Minnesota;  and  Robert  J.  Willis,  University  of  Michigan.
            Their papers provided a substantive context for the discussions that took
            place at the workshop.
               We also thank the many other people who participated as presenters,
            panelists,  and  discussants:  Christine  A.  Bachrach,  Duke  University  and
            University of Maryland; Kathleen A. Cagney, University of Chicago; Harris
            Cooper, Duke University; Sheila Jasanoff, Harvard University; Rebecca A.
            Maynard, University of Pennsylvania; Kenneth Prewitt, Columbia Univer-
            sity;  Barbara  Schneider,  Michigan  State  University;  and  Jack  E.  Triplett,
            Brookings Institution.
               In the preparation of this workshop summary, we thank Rose Maria
            Li, who acted as rapporteur. In addition, Mary Lou Rife was helpful in the
            drafting of one of the chapters, and Christine McShane provided expert
            editing services for this report.
               For a fuller list of sources on the topic than is included in this report,
            see  the  papers  presented  at  the  workshop:    http://www7.nationalacad-
            emies.org/dbasse/Workshop_on_Common_Metrics_Agenda.html.  For later
            versions of the papers, readers should contact the authors or look for a
            separate volume of the papers that is in preparation for submission to a
            university press.
               This workshop summary has been reviewed in draft form by individu-
            als chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accor-
            dance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee.
            The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical
            comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as
            sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards
            for  objectivity,  evidence,  and  responsiveness  to  the  charge.  The  review
            comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integ-
            rity of the process. We thank the following individuals for their review of
            this report: George W. Bohrnstedt, Research Division, American Institutes
            for Research; David S. Johnson, Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics
            Division, U.S. Census Bureau; and Howard J. Silver, Director’s Office, Con-
            sortium of Social Science Associations.
               Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive com-
            ments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the
            report, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The
            review of this report was overseen by Cora B. Marrett, acting deputy direc-
            tor, National Science Foundation. Appointed by the NRC, she was respon-
            sible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was
            carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review
            elements were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of
            this report rests entirely with the author and the institution.









                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13