Page 91 - The Importance of Common Metrics for Advacing Social Science Theory and Research
P. 91

The Importance of Common Metrics for Advancing Social Science Theory and Research: A Workshop Summary
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13034.html

            REFERENCES                                                    79

            National  Research  Council.  (1982). Behavioral  and  social  science  research:  A  national  re-
               source, Part 1. Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, R.M.
               Adams,  N.J.  Smelser,  and  D.J.  Treiman,  (Eds.).  Washington,  DC:  National  Academy
               Press.
            National Research Council. (1995). Measuring poverty: A new approach. Panel on Poverty
               and Family Assistance: Concepts, Information Needs, and Measurement Methods, C.F.
               Citro and R.T. Michael (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
            National  Research  Council.  (1996).  Spotlight  on  heterogeneity:  The  federal  standards  for
               racial  and  ethnic  classification.  Committee  on  National  Statistics.  Washington,  DC:
               National Academy Press.
            National Research Council. (2005). Measuring literacy: Performance levels for adults. Com-
               mittee  on  Performance  Levels  for  Adult  Literacy,  R.M.  Hauser,  C.F.  Edley,  Jr.,  J.A.
               Koenig, and S.W. Elliott (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
            Patrick, D.L., and Erickson, P. (1993). Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health
               care evaluation and resource allocation. Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press.
            Pollak, R.A. (2010). Standardized measurement. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Advanc-
               ing Social Science Theory: The Importance of Common Metrics. National Academies,
               Washington, DC, February 25-26.
            Prewitt, K. (1987). Public statistics and democratic politics. In W. Alonso and P. Starr (Eds.),
               The politics of numbers (pp. 113-128). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
            Shinn Jr., M. (1969). An application of pyschophysical scaling techniques to the measurement
               of national power. Journal of Politics, 31, 932-951.
            Snipp, C.M. (2010). Measuring race (and ethnicity). Paper prepared for the Workshop on
               Advancing Social Science Theory: The Importance of Common Metrics. National Acad-
               emies, Washington, DC, February 25-26.
            Treiman,  D.J.  (1976).  A  standard  occupational  prestige  scale  for  use  with  historical  data.
               Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 7, 283-304.
            Warren,  R.  (2010).  High  school  completion  rates.  Paper  prepared  for  the  Workshop  on
               Advancing Social Science Theory: The Importance of Common Metrics. National Acad-
               emies, Washington, DC, February 25-26.
            Willis, R.J. (2010). Standardization of measurement: What can we learn from the economic
               sciences? Paper prepared for the Workshop on Advancing Social Science Theory: The
               Importance of Common Metrics. National Academies, Washington, DC, February 25-26.
            Wright, E.O. 1993. Typologies, scales, and class analysis: A comment on Halaby and Weak-
               liem. American Sociological Review, 58, 31-34.




























                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96