Page 196 - The Master Handbook Of Acoustics
P. 196

171
                                                                         CONTROL OF INTERFERING NOISE


                      at a single number that would give a reasonably accurate indication
                      of the sound transmission loss characteristics of a wall. This has
                      been done in a procedure specified by the American Society for Test-
                      ing and Materials in which the measured graph of a wall would be
                      placed in a certain Sound Transmission Class (STC) by comparison
                      to a reference graph (STC contour). The details of this procedure are
                      beyond the scope of this book, but the results of such classification
                      have been applied to walls of various types to be described for ready
                      comparison. An STC rating of 50 dB for a wall would mean that it is
                      better in insulating against sound than a wall of STC 40 dB. It is not
                      proper to call STC ratings “averages” but the whole procedure is to
                      escape the pitfalls of averaging dB transmission losses at various fre-
                      quencies. 1


                      Comparison of Wall Structures

                      Figure 8-4 gives the measured performance of a 4 in concrete block wall
                      as a sound barrier. It is interesting to note that plastering both sides
                      increases the transmission loss of the wall from STC 40 to 48. Figure 8-
                      5 shows a considerable improvement in doubling the thickness of the
                      concrete block wall. In this case the STC 45 is improved 11 dB by plas-
                      tering both sides. In Fig. 8-6 is illustrated the very common 2 × 4 frame
                      construction with  ⁄8-in gypsum board covering. The STC 34 without
                                        5
                      fiberglass between is improved only 2 dB by filling the cavity with
                      fiberglass material, a meager improvement that would probably not jus-
                      tify the added cost.
                         Figure 8-7 describes a very useful and inexpensive type of wall of
                      staggered stud construction. Here the inherently low coupling
                      between the two independent wall diaphragms is further reduced by
                      filling the space with fiberglass building material. Attaining the full
                      STC 52 rating would require careful construction to ensure that the
                      two wall surfaces are truly independent and not “shorted out” by elec-
                      trical conduits, outlet boxes, etc.
                         The last wall structure to be described is the double wall construc-
                      tion of Fig. 8-8. The two walls are entirely separate, each having its
                                     2
                      own 2 × 4 plate. Without fiberglass this wall is only 1 dB better than
                      the staggered stud wall of Fig. 8-7 but by filling the inner space with
                      building insulation, STC ratings up to 58 dB are possible.
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201