Page 117 - The Resilient Organization
P. 117

104                  Part Three: Step 2. Building Resilience into the Organization



           1950s and early 1960s, a time when German aircraft manufacturers
           weren’t allowed to build planes. Incidentally, Messerschmitt was also the
           first company to produce a fighter jet [along with Heinckel (see Gibbert,
           Hoegl, & Välikangas, 2007)], so it is probably no surprise that the
           Kabinenroller looked like a scraped-off fighter-plane canopy on wheels
           (of which there were, appropriately, only three). More to the point, this
           “at-hand” kind of thinking led to characteristics such as aircraft light-
           weight materials, tandem seating, and aerodynamic styling, which made
           the little car not only highly fuel efficient—even by modern standards (87
           miles per gallon or 2.7 liters per 100 kilometers)—but also very fast for
           its day (65 miles per hour or 105 kilometers per hour).
              Or consider another fuel-efficient microcar that was built more than
           half a century ago: BMW’s Isetta. The origins of this car were with the
           Italian firm of Iso SpA. In the early 1950s, the company was building
           refrigerators, motor scooters, and small three-wheeled trucks. Iso’s
           owner, Renzo Rivolta, decided he would like to build a small car for
           mass consumption. By 1952 the engineers Ermenegildo Preti and
           Pierluigi Raggi had designed a small car that used the scooter engine,
           and they named it Isetta—an Italian diminutive meaning “little Iso.” It
           is said that the stylists had arrived at the award-winning design of the
           Isetta by taking two scooters, placing them side by side, and adding a
           refrigerator door!




          ORGANIZATIONAL ROBUSTNESS: RESILIENCE
          AS A DESIGN ISSUE

          When designing systems that are resilient, robustness is called for.
          Robustness is the system’s (or organization’s) structural stability to survive
          challenge while maintaining operability (and reliability). The more varied
          and intense the challenges the organization can cope with, the more robust
          it is. Robustness is also the capacity to accommodate multiple, different
          futures [being a “multimission” organization (see Levchuk, Meirina,
          Levchuk, Pattipati, & Kleiman, 2001)]. In this sense, robustness is the port-
          folio of strategies available for an organization and its capacity to adapt to
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122