Page 233 - The Resilient Organization
P. 233

218                         Part Four: Step 3. Rehearsing a Culture of Resilience


          less innovative than it could have been. In Donald Campbell’s terms, we
          have become mere assessors of the effectiveness of certain practices or
          programs. However, managers do not (often) intentionally set out to invent
          new management practice either. Rather, such activity appears to be
          serendipitous, not planned (see Birkinshaw, Hamel, & Mol, 2005).
             Partly to blame, perhaps, is a methodological mindset. By rushing into
          the comfort of validation as the acceptable tool (Lindblom, 1987; Weick,
          1996), a researcher is confined to refining the existing knowledge claims,
          shortcutting his or her capacity to be imaginative in creating interesting ideas
          to begin with (Weick, 1989; Hanson, 1960). Should the objection be that
          such inventive experimentation is the job of (open-minded) managers or the
          work of (occasionally mad) inventors and (frequently failing) entrepreneurs,
          not scholars, I would conjecture that it is not good enough for scholars to sit
          back and wait and see what works. Scholars need to get in the act of inno-
          vation and experimentation. Among managers, it is the instinctive mode,
          despite the evidence that local knowledge is sticky (Szulanski, 2003), to
          study best practices: What do other (well-performing) companies do about
          this? How do they manage the issue? Through inventive experimentation,
          inventor-experimenters, scholars, and managers alike can enrich or add to
          the quality and potential of management experience we can learn from.
             An increasing interest in outlier performance (Lewin, 1989) suggests a
          frustration with studying the best practice (or the average and the aggregate)
          and may help drive inventive experimentation. Yet ultimately, inventive
          experimentation is motivated by the inventor-experimenters’ desire, indeed
          compulsion, to invent and tinker with management practices. Let us hope
          there are more than a few inventor-experimenters among us, because—to par-
          aphrase Karl Popper—if we do not experiment, we become the experiment. 12



          CATALYZING MANAGEMENT INNOVATION:
          AN EXAMPLE

          To illustrate, I will relate an exercise that was specifically aimed at catalyz-
          ing management innovations at a U.S. retailer (see the full case study in
          Chapter 9, “Resilience in Action—Building Reservoirs for Change”). In one
          instance, the company engaged a group of people in an effort to invent
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238