Page 247 - The Resilient Organization
P. 247

232                                                             Endnotes


          CHAPTER 5


            1. Oracle Corporation acquired Sun Microsystems in 2009 in competi-
               tion with IBM.
            2. Liisa Välikangas, Martin Hoegl, and Michael Gibbert, “Why
               Learning from Failure Isn’t Easy (And What to Do About It):
               Innovation Trauma at Sun Microsystems,” European Management
               Journal, 2008. Reprinted with permission.
            3. Data were stored at a server where they were centrally managed,
               which rendered the computer box in the office just a dummy terminal.
            4. “Sun Ray is one of the coolest—but most poorly marketed—products
               I’ve seen in 20 years. The idea that anyone can insert his employee
               badge into any computer in the world and watch his own desktop
               appear on the screen instantly is astounding. Show the world what
               you [Scott McNealy] showed me in your office in December, and Sun
               will rise again.”
            5. The success of a particular innovation such as Sun Ray is subject
               not only to competence and hard work but to luck, timing, and
               serendipity. An innovation that fails may eventually succeed as
               conditions outside the innovator’s control change (such as the
               emergence of complementary technologies or the maturing of user
               attitudes).



          CHAPTER 6


            1. I thank Professor Yves Doz for feedback on this piece. I am grateful
               for many conversations around the notion of creeping commitment.
               All shortcomings are of course mine.
            2. Ashby’s law of requisite variety: The larger the variety of actions
               available to a control system, the larger the variety of perturbations
               it is able to compensate. Or, only variety can destroy variety.
            3. I am grateful to Matti Copeland of Helsinki for suggesting this
               method as a way of making “intelligent decisions.”
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252