Page 222 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 222

THEORY



              extend far beyond their physical locations. The globalization of television and other
              communications technologies has created an increasingly complex semiotic
              environment of competing signs and meanings that has been understood by certain
              writers to be postmodern. For some critics the globalization of an electronic TV  199
              culture is understood as a process of cultural mixing, matching and exchange in the
              production of hybridity though for others it represents a form of cultural
              domination or imperialism.

              Links Active audience, globalization, hegemony, identity, ideology, postmodernism, soap
              opera, text

           Text The everyday use of the concept of a text refers to writing in its various forms so
              that books and magazines are understood to be texts. However, it is an axiom of
              cultural studies that a text is anything that generates meaning through signifying
              practices. That is, a text is a metaphor that invokes the constitution of meaning
              through the organization of signs into representations. This includes the generation
              of meaning through images, sounds, objects (such as clothes) and activities (like
              dance and sport). Since images, sounds, objects and practices are sign systems which
              signify with the same fundamental mechanism as a language we may refer to them
              as cultural texts. Hence, dress, television programmes, images, sporting events, pop
              stars etc. can all be read as texts.
                 Texts can be analysed in terms of the arrangement of signs into sequences or
              codes that generate meaning through the cultural conventions of their use within
              a particular context. Textual analysis usually involves deconstructing the practices
              of cultural coding to show us how the apparent transparency of meaning is an
              outcome of cultural habituation. Any kind of textual analysis involves a somewhat
              arbitrary drawing of boundaries for particular purposes since meaning is unstable
              and cannot be confined to single words, sentences or particular texts. This is so
              because meaning has no single originatory source; rather it is the outcome of
              intertextuality, that is, the relationships between various sites of meaning. Here
              there is no ‘outside’ of a text since other texts form the exterior of any given text.
              Since texts are constitutive of their outsides so we may say with Derrida that there
              is nothing outside of texts or nothing but texts. However, this does not mean that
              there is no non-textual material world, rather it suggests that meaning is a product
              of textual arrangements.
                 Texts, as forms of representation, are polysemic; that is, they contain the
              possibility of a number of different meanings that have to be realized by actual
              readers who give life to words and images. While we can examine the ways in
              which texts work, we cannot simply ‘read-off’ audiences’ meaning production from
              textual analysis. At the very least, meaning is produced in the interplay between
              text and reader, that is, the hermeneutic circle.
              Links Code, hermeneutics, intertextuality, polysemy, representation, semiotics, signs

           Theory Theory can be understood as a form of narrative that seeks to distinguish and
              account for the general features that describe, define and explain persistently
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227