Page 86 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 86

ETHNOCENTRISM



              connotations. As such, ethnicity is centred on the commonality of cultural beliefs
              and practices. The formation of ‘ethnic groups’ relies on shared cultural signifiers
              that have developed under specific historical, social and political contexts and
              which encourage a sense of belonging based, at least in part, on a common  63
              mythological ancestry.
                 The anti-essentialist arguments of cultural studies suggest that ethnic groups are
              not based on primordial ties or universal cultural characteristics possessed by a
              specific group but are formed through discursive practices. That is, ethnicity is
              formed by the way we speak about group identities and identify with the signs and
              symbols that constitute ethnicity. Thus, ethnicity is a relational concept concerned
              with categories of self-identification and social ascription. Here, what we think of
              as our identity is dependent on what we think we are not so that, for example,
              Serbians are not Croatians, Bosnians or Albanians. However, to suggest that
              ethnicity is not about pre-given cultural difference but a process of boundary
              formation and maintenance does not mean that such distinctiveness cannot be
              socially constructed around signifiers that do connote universality, territory and
              purity. For example, discourses of ethnicity often invoke metaphors of blood,
              kinship and homeland.
                 The significance of the concept of ethnicity lies in its acknowledgment of the
              place of history, language and culture in the construction of subjectivity and
              identity. However, it does have some problems of usage and it remains a contested
              term. For instance, white Anglo-Saxons frequently use the concept of ethnicity to
              refer to  other people, usually with different skin pigmentation, so that Asians,
              Africans, Hispanics and African Americans are ethnic groups but the English or
              white Anglo-Saxon Americans or Australians are not. In contrast, it is important to
              maintain that white English, American or Australian people do constitute ethnic
              groups. Thus the value of studying whiteness lies in making it strange rather than
              taking it for granted as the universal touchstone of humanity.
                 Critics have also argued that the notion of ethnicity sidelines questions of power
              and racism when it is used to suggest, as in some discussions about
              multiculturalism, that a social formation operates through plurality and equality
              rather than with hierarchical groups. Consequently, some writers prefer the concept
              of ‘racialization’, not because it corresponds to any biological or cultural absolutes,
              but because it connotes, and refers investigation to, issues of power.
                 Discourses of ethnic centrality and marginality are commonly articulated with
              those of nationality so that history is littered with examples of how one ethnic
              group has been defined as central and superior to a marginal ‘other’. While Nazi
              Germany, apartheid South Africa and ‘ethnic cleansing’ in Bosnia are clear-cut
              examples, the use of ethnicity as a metaphor of superiority and subordination is also
              applicable within contemporary Britain, America and Australia.
              Links Difference, diaspora, hybridity, identity, national identity, race, representation

           Ethnocentrism The general use of the term ethnocentrism refers to the process by
              which values and ways of seeing the world that are founded in one culture are used
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91