Page 88 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 88

EXPERIENCE



              ethnography has tended to rely on a realist epistemology and has thus opened itself
              up to considerable critique. In particular, not only is ethnography inevitably
              ‘positional’ or ethnocentric knowledge but also it is a genre of writing that deploys
              rhetorical devices, often obscured, to maintain its realist claims. This argument has  65
              led to the examination of ethnographic texts for their rhetorical devices, along with
              a more reflexive and dialogical approach to ethnography which demands that
              writers should elaborate on their own assumptions, views and positions.
                 If we think that the purpose of ethnography and other forms of qualitative
              empirical work lies in the discovery of accurate representations of an objective
              reality then the critique of ethnographic realism is devastating. However, the
              critique of the epistemological claims of ethnography does not leave it without
              worth or significance for its purposes do not have to lie in the production of a ‘true’
              picture of the world. Rather, ethnography has personal, poetic and political, rather
              than epistemological, justifications.
                 The problems of ethnography are issues of translation and justification not
              universal or objective truth. If we consider languages (and thus culture and
              knowledge) as constituted not by untranslatable and incompatible rules but as
              learnable skills, then ethnography can be understood as a part of the continued re-
              description of the world that supplies new initiatives that enrich our culture with
              innovative ideas.
                 This does not mean that ethnographic research can abandon all methodical
              rigour. First, evidence and poetic style are pragmatically useful warrants for truth
              and action epistemologically equivalent to the procedural agreements of the
              physical sciences. Second, the languages of observation and evidence are among the
              conventions that divide the genre of ethnography from the novel. Third, the
              rejection of a universal objective truth is based on the impossibility of word–world
              correspondence and therefore of accurate or adequate representation. This does not
              mean that we have to abandon word–word translation. That is, we can achieve
              ‘good enough’ reporting of the speech or action of others without making claims
              to universal truth.

              Links Ethnocentricism, methodology, positionality, representation, text, truth

           Experience The idea of experience appears somewhat paradoxically within cultural
              studies. On the one hand, this notion is crucial to understanding culture when
              grasped in terms of lived meaningful experience. On the other hand, one cannot
              understand experience or undergo meaningful experiences without the framing
              work of language. Thus experience seems to disappear as a concrete category into
              those of discourse and language.
                 For an example of the first case we may turn to Raymond Williams, for whom
              culture is best understood as ‘a whole and distinctive way of life’. Here Williams
              stresses that culture involves ‘lived experience’ and he was particularly concerned
              with the working class and their active construction of culture. For Williams, the
              purpose of cultural analysis is to explore and analyse the recorded culture of a given
              time and place in order to reconstitute the experience and ‘structure of feeling’ of
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93