Page 42 - The Toyota Way Fieldbook
P. 42

20                        THE TOYOTA WAY FIELDBOOK


        on time, and allows Toyota to get paid without holding enormous amounts of
        inventory. Similar lean processes can be found in product development, where
        Toyota has the fastest development times in the industry, getting updated
        styling and features to customers faster, with higher quality, and at a lower cost
        than competitors. And lean internal processes even extend throughout Toyota’s
        business support functions, to sales, purchasing, production engineering,  and
        planning, though the lean processes are not as formalized as in manufacturing
        and product development.
            What is less understood is that lean systems are not just about tools and tech-
        niques, but about philosophy. For example, it’s easy to understand how elimi-
        nating waste using lean tools will lead to immediate financial returns. But what
        about the necessity of creating some waste in the short term in order to elimi-
        nate waste in the long term? Consider the following scenarios:

           1. To treat the value-added worker as a surgeon and get him or her all the
              tools and parts needed to do the job without distracting the worker from
              value-added work may require some non-value-added preparation. Tools
              and parts may need to be prepared in advance in right-sized containers
              or kits, and a material handler might need to bring these frequently to the
              place where value-added work is being done.
           2. To reduce batch size and improve the flow of parts through the system
              may require changing over the tooling on a piece of equipment more fre-
              quently, incurring additional setup costs. SMED (single minute exchange
              of dies) procedures can dramatically reduce the setup time and cost, but
              many companies want to use that saved time to produce more parts, adding
              to overproduction instead of using the time to reduce batch size.
           3. To improve the quality and reduce the lead time of the product develop-
              ment process may require investing in dedicated chief engineers who run
              the programs but do not manage the people working on the programs.
              This is an additional role beyond that of the more typical program man-
              ager role. Chief engineers have a lot of responsibility and need to be well
              paid.
           4. Improving the quality of a product launch may require involving suppliers
              early in the process and partnering with suppliers that are highly compe-
              tent technically, thus paying more money per piece initially, rather than
              seeking the lowest cost commodity producer.
            In other words, it may be necessary to invest some money in the short term to
        get the high-quality lean processes needed to save money in the long term. And to
        make matters worse, it may not be easy to exactly calculate the savings attributable
        to a particular action that costs some money. For example, what is the benefit of pro-
        ducing smaller batch sizes compared to the cost of changing over more frequently?
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47