Page 73 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 73

degree of freedom Stewart platforms have been proposed [56], including one that allows strut lengths
                                 to be moved in 0.10 nm increments across a 100 nm work envelope. A number of other nanodevices
                                 including box-spring accelerometers, displacement accelerometers, pivoted gyroscopic accelerometers,
                                 and gimbaled nanogyroscopes have been proposed and designed [56].
                                   Currently, much thought is being devoted to molecular assembly and self-replicating devices (self-
                                 replicating nanorobots). Self-assembly is arguably the only way for nanotechnology to advance in an
                                 engineering or technological sense. Assembling a billion or trillion atom device—one atom at a time—
                                 would be a great accomplishment. It would take a huge investment in equipment, labor, and time. Freitas
                                 [56]  describes the infrastructure needed  to  construct a simple medical nanorobot:  a 1-µm spherical
                                 respirocyte consisting of about 18 billion atoms. He estimates that a factory production line deploying
                                 a coordinated system of 100 macroscale scanning probe microscope (SPM) assemblers, where each
                                 assembler is capable of depositing one atom per second on a convergently-assembled workpiece, would
                                 result in a manufacturing throughput of two nanorobots per decade. If one conjectures about enormous
                                 increases in assembler manufacturing rates even to the extent of an output of one nanorobot per minute,
                                 it would take two million years to build the first cubic centimeter therapeutic dosage of nanorobots.
                                 Thus, it is clear that the future of medical nanotechnology and nanoengineering lies in the direction of
                                 self-assembly and self-replication.




                                 References
                                    1. Bridgman, P. W., Dimensional Analysis, 2nd Ed., Yale University Press, 1931.
                                    2. Buckingham, E., “On physically similar systems: illustrations of the use of dimensional equations,”
                                      Physical Review, 4(4):345–376, 1914.
                                    3. Huntley, H. E., Dimensional Analysis, Dover Publications, 1967.
                                    4. Langhaar, H. L., Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models, John Wiley and Sons, 1951.
                                    5. Taylor, E. S., Dimensional Analysis for Engineers, Oxford University Press, 1974.
                                    6. Israelachvili, J. N., Intermolecular and Surface Forces, Academic Press, 1985, pp. 9–10.
                                    7. Fearing, R. S., “Microactuators for microrobots: electric and magnetic,” Workshop on Micromecha-
                                      tronics, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1997.
                                    8. Bobbio, S. M., Keelam, M. D., Dudley, B. W., Goodwin-Hohansson, S., Jones, S. K., Jacobson, J. D.,
                                      Tranjan, F. M., Dubois, T. D.,  “Integrated force arrays,”  Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro
                                      Mechanical Systems, 149–154, 1993.
                                    9. Jacobson, J. D., Goodwin-Johansson, S. H., Bobbio, S. M., Bartlett, C. A., Yadon, L. N., “Integrated
                                      force arrays: theory and modeling of static operation,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems,
                                      4(3):139–150, 1995.
                                   10. Yamaguchi, M., Kawamura, S., Minami, K., Esashi, M., “Distributed electrostatic micro actuators,”
                                      Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 18–23, 1993.
                                   11. Kim, C. J., Pisano, A. P., Muller, R. S., “Silicon-processed overhanging microgripper,” Journal of
                                      Microelectromechanical Systems, 1(1):31–36, 1992.
                                   12. Matsubara, T.,  Yamaguchi, M., Minami, K., Esashi, M., “Stepping electrostatic microactuator,”
                                      International Conference on Solid-State Sensor and Actuators, 50–53, 1991.
                                   13. Niino, T., Egawa, S., Kimura, H., Higuchi, T., “Electrostatic artificial muscle: compact, high-power
                                      linear actuators with multiple-layer structures,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Micro Electro
                                      Mechanical Systems, 130–135, 1994.
                                   14. Huang, J. B., Mao, P. S., Tong, Q. Y., Zhang, R. Q., “Study on silicon electrostatic and electroqua-
                                      sistatic micromotors,” Sensors and Actuators, 35:171–174, 1993.
                                   15. Mehragany, M., Bart, S. F., Tavrow, L. S., Lang, J. H., Senturia, S. D., Schlecht, M. F., “A study of
                                      three microfabricated variable-capacitance motors,” Sensors and Actuators, 173–179, 1990.
                                   16. Trimmer, W., Gabriel, K., “Design considerations for a practical electrostatic micromotor,” Sensors
                                      and Actuators, 11:189–206, 1987.

                                 ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78