Page 152 - Toyota Under Fire
P. 152

THE RECALL CRISIS


        found 205 total stories for the month of February alone, of which
        196 were negative.* A set of myths about Toyota quality and
        safety lapses (which we summarize in Table 3.1 along with the
        underlying facts) had taken hold. Testimony from executives was
        clearly not enough to turn the tide.

            TABLE 3.1  ENGINEERING ERRORS LEADING
                 TO RECALLS: MYTHS AND REALITY
          RECALL
           ISSUE      MYTH            REALITY          CAUSE
         1. Pedal en-  Carpet design   No defect exists with properly  Improper use
          trapment   causes pedal   installed floor mat. Floor mats  of floor mats.
          by unse-  entrapment,   that are unsecured, stacked,
          cured or   leading to    or incompatible have the
          incompat- accidents and   potential to entrap the
          ible floor   deaths.  accelerator pedal. Also true
          mat                  for other auto makers.
         2. Sticking   Pedal frequently  In rare cases, pedal can get   As a result of
           accelera-  gets stuck,    sticky and return slowly to   heat, humid-
           tor pedal  leading to    idle or temporarily stick par-  ity, or con-
                   uncontrollable   tially depressed. There were  densation,
                   acceleration   no cases of wide-open throt- synthetic ma-
                   and causing   tle or uncontrollable acceler-  terial in pedal
                   many accidents. ation. In all cases, brakes will  can become
                               stop car in normal stopping   sticky. Brak-
                               distance.             ing perfor-
                                                     mance is not
                                                     affected.
                                                        (continues
                                                        next page)

        *  We thank James Franz for this research. Franz qualified as negative only sto-
        ries that did not include any positive perspectives on Toyota or qualify negative
        judgments, and that used disparaging language like “Toyota’s reckless irrespon-
        sibility.”

                                  121
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157