Page 237 - Bird R.B. Transport phenomena
P. 237

§7.8  Derivation of the Macroscopic Mechanical Energy Balance  221

                              The type  of motion that the manometer liquid  exhibits  depends on the value  of the dis-
                          criminant in Eq. 7.7-22:
                                      2 2
                           (a)  If (6fjb/pR )  > (6g/L),  the system is over damped, and the liquid moves slowly  to its final
                                                  position.
                                     2 2
                           (b)  If (в/л/pR )  < (6g/L),  the system is under damped, and the liquid oscillates about its
                                                  final position, the oscillations becoming smaller and smaller.
                                     2 2
                           (c)  If (в/л/pR )  = (6g/L),  the system is critically damped, and the liquid moves to its final
                                                  position in the most rapid monotone fashion.
                          The tube radius for critical damping is then

                                                              (*£)'"                           .7.7-25»


                          If the tube radius R is greater  than R cr, an oscillatory  motion  occurs.


     §7.8  DERIVATION OF THE MACROSCOPIC
                                                1
           MECHANICAL ENERGY BALANCE
                          In Eq. 7.4-2 the macroscopic  mechanical  energy  balance was presented  without  proof. In
                          this section we show how the equation  is obtained  by integrating  the equation  of change
                          for  mechanical  energy  (Eq. 3.3-2) over the entire  volume  of the flow  system  of Fig. 7.0-1.
                          We begin by doing the formal  integration:

                                                          2
                           /  j t (W  +  РФ) dV = -  j  (V • {\pv  + Ф)у) dV-  j  (V • pv) dV -  j  (V •  [т • v]) dV
                                                              Р
                           V(t)                 V(t)                  V(t)          1/(0
                                                   p(V  • v) dV  +  |  (T:VV) dV                (7.8-1)
                                                  )           V(t)
                          Next  we apply  the 3-dimensional  Leibniz  formula  (Eq. A.5-5)  to the left  side  and  the
                          Gauss divergence theorem (Eq. A.5-2) to terms 1, 2, and 3 on the right side.

                          j  j  (W  + p&)dV=-j(n-    (W   + Ф)(у - v)) dS -  j  (n •  pv) dS
                           t                                Р      s
                             V(t)               S(t)                       Sit)
                                              -  j  (n  •  [T • v]) dS +  J  p(V  • v) dV  +  |  (T:VV) dV  (7.8-2)
                                                S(t)             V(t)         V(t)
                          The term containing v , the velocity  of the surface  of the system, arises  from the applica-
                                             s
                          tion of the Leibniz formula. The surface  S(t) consists of four parts:
                              • the fixed  surface  S  (on which both v and v  are zero)
                                                f
                                                                    s
                              • the moving surfaces  S  (on which v  = v  with both nonzero)
                                                   m
                                                                  s
                              • the cross section of the entry port Si (where v  =  0)
                                                                      s
                              • the cross section of the exit port S  (where v  =  0)
                                                             2       s
                          Presently each of the surface  integrals will be split into four parts corresponding to these
                          four  surfaces.
                              We  now interpret the terms in Eq. 7.8-2 and, in the process, introduce several as-
                          sumptions; these assumptions have already been mentioned in §§7.1 to 7.4, but now the
                          reasons for them will be made clear.


                              1
                               R. B. Bird, Korean J. Chem.  Eng., 15,105-123  (1998), §3.
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242