Page 661 - Bird R.B. Transport phenomena
P. 661

§20.4  Boundary  Layer  Mass Transport with Complex Interfacial  Motion  641

                           in which  к is an average  thickness  of  the concentration boundary  layer.  When  Eq.  20.4-14
                           is written  in terms  of  this new  variable,  we  get





                                                                                              (20.4-15)
                                              "   2  [dY 2    °    M
                           for  ci)  in terms  of  u, w,  Y, and  t. Since, on physical  grounds, к will decrease with  decreas-
                                A
                           ing 4b , the dominant terms  for  small 2)  are those of lowest  order in к—namely,  all but
                                                             лв
                                AB
                           the В у and  (V  • n) contributions. The subdominance  of  the latter terms  confirms  the as-
                                       o
                           ymptotic validity  of approximations  (ii) and  (iii) in non-recirculating  flows.
                               Now, the coefficients  of  all the dominant terms must be proportional over  the range
                           of ЯЬ , in order that these terms remain  of comparable size in the 5та11-2) лв  limit. Such a
                                АВ
                           "dominant  balance  principle"  was  applied  previously  in  §13.6.  Here it gives  the orders
                           of  magnitude
                                               ЯЬ /к 2  =      and     V IJ0 /K  =         (20.4-16,17)
                                                 АВ
                           for  the terms  of the lowest  order with  respect  to к. Equation 20.4-16 is consistent with the
                           previous  examples  of  \-power  dependence  of  the diffusional  boundary  layer  thickness
                           on  % AB  in  free-surface  flows.  It also  confirms  the asymptotic  correctness  of  assumption
                           (iv)  for  small  values  of  % .  Equation 20.4-17  is  consistent with  the proportionality  of v*
                                                AB
                           to  ^/ЯЬ  shown  under  Eq.  20.1-10  for  the  Arnold  problem.  Thus,  the boundary  layer
                                  АВ
                           equation  for  to  in either phase near a deforming  interface  is
                                       A
                                                                                              (20.4-18)

                           to lowest  order  in  к. At  the next order  of  approximation, terms proportional to к  would
                           appear,  and  these  involve  the  tangential  velocity  уВц  and  the  interfacial  curvature
                           (V o  • n). The latter term appears  in Problems 20C.1 and 20C.2.
                               Multiplication  of  Eq.  20.4-18 by  p/M A  (a constant  for  the assumptions  made here),
                           and use  of  z  as  the coordinate normal to the interface  as  in Example  20.1-1, give the cor-
                           responding  equation for  the molar concentration c {u, w, z, t)
                                                                     A
                                                           dins
                                               dt         '  dt                               (20.4-19)
                           which  allows convenient extension  of  several  earlier  examples.  Another  useful  corollary
                           is the binary boundary  layer  equation in terms  of x A  and  v*

                                                                                              (20.4-20)
                                        dt           dt            dz f.
                           in which  с and 9)  have been treated as constants, as in Example 20.1-1.
                                          AB


       EXAMPLE   20.4-1    Equation  20.4-19 readily  gives  a  generalized  form  of  Eq. 20.1-65,  by  omitting  the reaction
                           source  term  R A  and  neglecting  the normal  velocity  term  v z0  (thus assuming  the  interfacial
      Mass  Transfer with  net  mass  flux  to be  small).  The equation thus  obtained  has  the form  of  Eq. 20.1-65,  except
      Nonuniform Interfacial  that  the total  surface  growth  rate d  In S/dt  is  replaced  by  the  local  growth  rate, given  by
      Deformation          д  In s(u, w, t)ldt.  The resulting  partial  differential  equation  has  two  additional  space  vari-
                           ables  (u and w), but is solvable in the same manner, since no derivatives  with  respect  to the
                           added  variables  appear.
   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666