Page 309 - Tunable Lasers Handbook
P. 309

6  Transition Metal Solid-state Lasers   269

                        Normal mode thresholds for flashlamp-pumped Cr:LiSrA1F6 are consider-
                     ably lower than they are for Cr:LiCaA1F6, reflecting the higher gain of the for-
                     mer  laser  material.  Experimental  results  are  available  for  6,35-mm-diameter
                     laser rods. The length of the Cr:LiCaAlF,  was 80 mm:  the length of the Cr:Li-
                     SrAlF, was 100 mm. Although the experimental arrangements are somewhat dif-
                     ferent, including the exact pump cavity. there are enough similarities for a com-
                     parison. Threshold for Cr:LiCaAlF,  varied from about 55 to 82 J as the output
                     mirror reflectivity decreased from  0.944  to  0.62  [43]. On the  oiher hand,  the
                     threshold for Cr:LiSrA1F6 varied from 15 to 32 J as the output mirror reflectivity
                     decreased from 0.985 to 0.43  [44].  From these measurements, the double-pass
                     loss was deduced as 0.49 for Cr:LiCaAlF, and 0.39 for the Cr:LiSrA1F6. Consid-
                     erably  lower  thresholds  can  be  expected  if  this  relatively  high  loss  can  be
                     reduced.  Because  both  of  these  laser  materials  can  be  considered  to  be  new
                     materials at this time, a relatively high loss is not surprising.
                        Even at this  stage of development, normal mode  slope efficiencies can be
                     relatively  high.  Slope  efficiency  of  a  normal  mode  Cr:LiCaAlF,  increased
                     monotonically with  a decrease  in  the  output mirror reflectivity. As  the  output
                     mirror reflectivity decreased from 0.944 to 0.62, the slope efficiency increased
                     from 0.0035 to 0.0155 [43]. Such an increase is consistent with a nonsaturable
                     passive loss.  Slope efficiency of  a normal mode  Cr:LiSrA1F6 also displayed a
                     monotonic  increase  in  the  slope  efficiency  as  the  output  mirror  reflectivity
                     decreased. For this laser material, the slope efficiency increased from 0.0043 to
                     0.050 as the output mirror reflectivity decreased from 0.985 to 0.43 [44]. Slope
                     efficiency is expected to increase as the quality of  the laser materid  increases
                     and more nearly optimum configurations are developed.
                        Tuning of  these laser materials has been demonstrated over  wide  spectral
                     regions. Cr:LiCaA1F6 has operated between about 0.72 and 0.85 pm [45]. Short-
                     wavelength operation appears to be limited primarily by ground state absorption.
                     Long-wavdength operation is limited by  a combination of  effects including the
                     decreasing effective stimulated emission cross section and the increasing excited
                     state  absorption.  Cr:LiSrA1F6 has  lased  over  the  approximate  range  between
                     0.78 and  1.01 pm  [44]. Limits on the short-wavelength operation are probably
                     caused by  ground state absorption, a decrease in effective stimulated emission
                     cross section. and possibly excited state absorption. Long-wavelength operation
                     is also limited by a decreasing effective stimulated emission cross section.
                        Continuous wave operation of  these laser materials has been demonstrated
                     using  a 0.647-pm  Kr  ion  laser pump.  Slope efficiencies €or Cr:LiCaA1F6 and
                     Cr:LiSrAAlF6 were measured as 0.54 and 0.36, respectively [43]~ Slope efficiency
                     is limited by the ratio of the pump wavelength to the lasing wavelength. Based
                     on this.  slope efficiencies should be 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. Part of the dif-
                     ference between the observed slope efficiency and the maximum slope efficiency
                     can be attributed to the losses in the resonator. However, because the observed
                     slope efficiency of  Cr:LiSr,41F6 is  less  than  half  of  the  limit, an  excited  state
                     absorption mechanism has been used to explain the difference.
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314