Page 349 - Tunable Lasers Handbook
P. 349

7 Optical Parametric OsciIIators   309




















                           FIGURE 6  Definition of orthogonal acceptance angles for a uniaxial crystal.


                     index varies  as the  angle  in  the optic plane  varies  but  is independent. to  first
                     order. of a variation of the angle orthogonal to the optic plane. In the optic plane,
                     the derivative of the refractive index with angle is






                     Having evaluated the derivative of the refractive index with angle, the variation
                     of the wave vector for extraordinary waves is

                                                                                   (33)


                     FOP ordinary waves,  this derivative is, of  course, zero. In most  cases, the  first-
                     order derivative will dominate. As such, the acceptance angle will be determined
                     using the first-order approximation. However. orthogonal to the optic plane, the
                     first-order teim vanishes. Here, the acceptance angle is determined by the second-
                     order term. Usually, the first-order term will restrict the acceptance angle an order
                     of magnitude more than the second-order term. First-order acceptance angles are
                     often an the order of  a few milliradians, comparable to the beam divergence of
                     the laser in many cases. Because the second-order term is so much less restric-
                     tive, the acceptance angle orthogonal to the optic plane is often ignored. In biax-
                     ial crystals, fhe acceptance angles in orthogonal directions assume much more
                     importance. In these cqvstals, the refractive index will, in general. depend criti-
                     cally on variations in the direction of propagation in both directions.
                        Measured  acceptance  angles  agree  well  with  the  acceptance  angles  pre-
                     dicted using Ihe preceding analysis. Although many examples are available, only
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354