Page 42 - Tunable Lasers Handbook
P. 42

2  Narrow-tinewidth Laser Oscillators   23

                     dynamics  of  the  active medium  influences  the  outcome  in  conjunction  with
                     intracavity dispersion.


                     8.  INTRACAVITY MULTl PLE-PRISM DISPERSION
                     AND PULSE COMPRESSION

                        In  femtosecond  lasers  the  gain  and  saturable  absorber  media  introduce
                     group  velocity dispersion  (GVD) that  leads  to  pulse broadening. The  deploy-
                     ment of intracavity prisms allows for the compensation of GVD via the introduc-
                     tion of negative GVD [5 I]. This occurs because GVD is a function of the second
                     derivative (d2PldI.2) of the optical path length through the prismatic sequence. In
                     turn, (d2PldI.2) is a function of the angular dispersion of the multiple-prism array
                     and its derivative and can be made negative by adjusting the inter-prism distance
                     [52]. In general, these parameters can be expressed as [1,2,53,54]





















                                                                                  (19)

                     where xl,m = tan w~,~,. These equations are general and enable the design of any
                     multiple-prism array for pulse compression. In this regard, the equations can be
                     applied to one, two, four, six prisms or more [51,52,55-571 (Fig. 7). Further, the
                     equations can be utilized to provide a numerical description of  intracavity dis-
                     persion  in  generalized prismatic  arrays  as  a function  of  angular and/or beam
                     deviations [54]. The use of these multiple-prism arrays in femtosecond dye laser
                     cavities is discussed in Chapter 5.
                        For the special case of a single prism deployed at Brewster's angle of  inci-
                     dence, the equations reduce to the case discussed by Fork et al. [52]:
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47