Page 308 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 308

CAT3525_C09.qxd  2/8/2005  10:11 AM  Page 279
                       Incineration of MSW                                                         279
                       and the coal second. Such uneven burning will cause fluctuations in steam production. This segre-
                       gation problem can be partly alleviated by mixing the fuels in the field, immediately before burn-
                       ing (Figure 9.16).
                          The RDF may cause problems in storage. It is fibrous, carbonaceous, and of relatively low density.
                       Contact with rainfall will rapidly alter the physical and chemical properties of the RDF. Pelletized RDF
                       will decompose and lose its physical strength and will no longer be easily handled. Second, a wet mate-
                       rial will rapidly undergo anaerobic reactions. The RDF has many fine pores which will tenaciously
                       retain moisture. Foul odors will be produced and the RDF will cause the growth of mold and other
                       undesirable organisms. The best precautions against this scenario are to store it indoors or in a covered
                       facility in the field. Furthermore, storage of RDF should not be prolonged; ideally, it should be burned
                       within 24 h of its production. Poslusny et al. (1987) found that addition of a Ca(OH) binder to the pel-
                                                                                        2
                       lets during initial processing was successful in lengthening the storage lifetime of the pellets.
                          Dust production is inevitable with storage and handling of dry RDF; therefore, dust control
                       equipment must be provided within both the combustion and storage areas. Forced ventilation com-
                       bined with air filters are strongly recommended.
                          It should be clear by now that mechanical separation of MSW components is by no means 100%
                       effective; therefore, contamination by food and yard waste, and other undesirable components will
                       occur. As a result, odor production is inevitable in stored RDF, particularly in the warmer months.
                       The RDF must therefore not be stored in a boiler building for extended periods; rather it should be
                       loaded into the building daily for combustion.
                          In a study by Fiscus et al. (1978), total airborne bacteria concentrations were measured in a
                       number of waste handling facilities including a RDF plant, incinerator, landfill, transfer station,
                       waste collection vehicle, and wastewater treatment plant. The highest airborne bacterial concentra-
                       tions were found in the RDF plant. Mahar (1999) studied the atmospheres in several locations
                       within two RDF facilities. The data for particulate matter appear in Table 9.9, and that for total
                       bioaerosols and endotoxins are in Table 9.10. The particulates detected were primarily in the non-
                       respirable size range. Biologically derived particulates were found to a greater extent in areas where
                       the waste had been processed as opposed to stored.

                       9.8.5 GASEOUS EMISSIONS AND CORROSION ISSUES
                       When combusting a fuel containing 100% RDF, emissions of acid gases and hydrocarbons were
                       consistently lower compared with bituminous coal alone (Pichtel, 1991). Oxides of sulfur and NO x
                                                                                       3
                                                          3
                       measured approximately 700 and 200 mg/m compared with 1600 and 550 mg/m , respectively, for

                                     TABLE 9.9
                                                                 3
                                                          a
                                     Particulate Comparisons (mg/m ) in Different Areas of an
                                     RDF Plant
                                     Location       Inhalable Particles  Total Particles  Respirable
                                                                                Particles
                                     Floor          2.24 (7)        1.15 (6)    0.09 (7)
                                     Loadout        0.52 (2)        0.15 (2)    0.04 (2)
                                     Lunchroom      0.13 (3)        0.06 (3)    0.07 (3)
                                     Magnetic separator  3.06 (4)   1.26 (4)    0.10 (4)
                                     Processing     0.73 (4)        0.38 (3)    0.16 (4)
                                     a Geometric mean, n
                                     Source: Mahar, S., Waste Manage. Res., 17, 343–346, 1999. Reproduced with
                                           kind permission of the International Solid Waste Association.
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313