Page 65 - Water Loss Control
P. 65

What is Necessary to Contr ol the W ater Loss Pr oblem?    47


                       As discussed, there have been many very positive changes in the U.S. water indus-
                    try since the start of the new millennium, with several states and regulatory authorities
                    adopting and/or promoting standardized water loss management. The authors believe
                    that it is only a matter of time until efficient water loss management is required on a
                    federal level in the United States, with many projected benefits for water consumers,
                    water utilities, and the environment.


               4.5 Summary
                    Water loss is truly a global problem that requires focused attention and awareness from
                    a wide variety of stakeholders: federal, state, and local governments, water suppliers,
                    environmental groups, and consumers. The most successful water loss management
                    programs around the world exist in countries which have enacted regulations requiring
                    the water supplier to apply best management practices. The causes and remedies of
                    water and revenue loss are now well understood, and innovative technology makes
                    loss control efficient and cost effective. As demonstrated in a number of states in recent
                    years, it is now necessary for the insidious issue of water loss to assume a position of
                    priority on the policy and regulatory agenda of the United States.
                       Table 4.1 provides a comparison of general characteristics, water loss manage-ment meth-
                    ods, and regulatory structures in the Unites States, England and Wales, and Germany.

                Parameter         United States         England and Wales  Germany
                                            General Characteristics
                Number of water   More than 59,000      23                More than 5000
                suppliers
                Legal form of water   Great majority public  Private      Great majority public
                suppliers
                Per capita        100 to 200 gal/cap/d  38 gal/cap/d      34 gal/cap/d
                consumption       (376 to 752 L/cap/d)  (145 L/cap/d)     (130 L/cap/d)
                Service density   70 to 100 con/mi      40 to 150 con/mi  40 to 150 con/mi
                                  (44 to 63 con/km)     (25 to 94 con/km)  (25 to 94 con/km)
                Pressure          ~71 psi (50 mH)       ~71 psi (50 mH)   ~ 43 psi (30 mH)
                Proportion of     95 to 100%            5 to 60%          95 to 100%
                metered residential
                customers
                Break rate        250 breaks/1000 mi/   350 breaks/1000   not collected
                                  year                  mi/year
                                  (156 breaks/1000      (219 breaks/1000
                                  km/year)              km/year
                Real losses       75 gal/con/d          30 gal/con/d      19 gal/con/d 1
                                  (282 L/con/d)         (113 L/con/d)     (71 L/con/d)

               (Source: Ref. 4.)
               TABLE 4.1  Comparison of General Characteristics of Water Loss Management Methods and Regulatory
               Structures in the United States, England and Wales, and Germany (Continued)
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70