Page 142 - Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
P. 142

132               Well Logging and Formation Evaluation

          the maximum will give an indication of which basis for determination is
          likely to be the most favorable to your company. However, we will assume
          for further discussions that the BOE method is decided upon as being the
          most reasonable basis for equity determination.
            At this point it is probably best to decide whether it is going to be advan-
          tageous to push for a saturation/height function approach to saturation
          determination or to opt for a simple Archie approach. Arguments that can
          be used in favor of either approach are:

          Pro Archie:
          •  It is relatively easy to agree on the Archie input parameters, particu-
            larly if SCAL (special core analysis) data are available and the water
            leg has been logged.
          •  Most petrophysicists will tend to average capillary (cap)-curve data a
            different way, and it is hard to agree on a common saturation/height
            function.

          Pro J Function:
          •  Saturation/height functions are the only acceptable way to do volu-
            metrics in a field.
          •  This is the type of function that will be used for the dynamic model, so
            it should also be used for the volumetrics.


            The next step is to determine the relative weight that each of the various
          input parameters has on the equity. This is done by varying the input param-
          eters sequentially within justifiable ranges and observing the effects on
          EQ(BOE 1 ) and EQ(BOE 2 ). The result might be as shown in Figure 9.3.1.
            These results tell you where you can hope to make the most impact on
          equity. If negotiating which parameters to use with partners, you can
          decide up front where you should make a strong case for a particular
          parameter being used, possibly in exchange for being more lax on another
          parameter.

          Net/Gross

            If the wells on your side of the boundary tend to have formations of
          poorer quality than those on the opposing side, it is in your interest to
          push for little or no cutoffs to be applied. As stated in Chapter 2, there are
          many good arguments for not applying cutoffs, but even those that are
          applied can be calculated in a way that is favorable to your side through
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147