Page 20 - Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
P. 20

10                Well Logging and Formation Evaluation

          • Lost-in-hole charge: For replacement of any tools lost in the hole during
            operations. Some contractors provide insurance to the oil companies for
            a fixed sum per job to indemnify them against lost-in-hole charges.
          • Cable splice charge: Where tools become stuck in the hole and it is
            necessary to cut the cable, a charge is usually made for such splicing.
          • Processing charges: Where data require postprocessing (e.g., interpre-
            tation of image data or waveform sonic), charges are usually applied in
            a similar way to survey charges.
          • Data charges: Provision of additional copies of log prints and/or tapes,
            or data storage, may incur additional charges.
          • Real-time data transmission charges: The oil company will usually be
            given the option to have data transmitted directly from the wellsite to
            their office, either as digital data in Log ASCII Standard or binary
            format or as a print image.

            Most contracts offer the oil company a discount on the total monthly
          charges based on total volume of services called out during a particular
          month. Some oil companies operate incentive schemes that penalize the
          contractor financially based on lost time resulting from tool failures. There
          may also be bonuses based on good safety performance.
            When new tools being introduced by the contractor and not covered by
          the contract are proposed to be run, there will normally be some negoti-
          ation on special pricing. The oil company takes into account that if there
          is a testing element in the new tool being run, there is a benefit accruing
          to the contractor. Hence, the oil company may argue that the tool should
          be run free of charge initially.  The contractor will usually argue that
          the oil company is benefiting from the tool’s technological advantages
          over alternative older-generation tools. Often a compromise is reached
          whereby the tool is run at a preferential pricing scheme (maybe equiva-
          lent to the price of the tool being replaced) for the first few runs until its
          usefulness has been proved. Typically the contractor will request the right
          to use the data acquired for future promotion of the tool, subject to con-
          fidentiality restrictions.
            Most oil companies will also specify, either in the contract or in a
          separate document, how data are to be delivered to their offices and
          what quality-control procedures should be followed during logging. Items
          typically specified in such a document will include:

          • Pre- and postrun tool calibration procedures
          • Sampling increments
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25