Page 23 - Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
P. 23

Basics                          13

             1
            8 / 2≤ hole section:
            GR/resistivity/density/neutron
            Dipole sonic/formation imager
            Pressure/fluid sampling (sampling dependent on oil being encountered)
            VSP
            Sidewall samples


               Note that it is not usually necessary to specify that the SP will be run,
            since this service is usually provided free and the log will be included in
            the first toolstring in the hole by default. Likewise, thermometers are
            usually run in the toolstring as standard, and the maximum temperature
            recorded is included in the log header. Prior to the actual logging job in
            each section, a program is usually sent to the rig with the following more
            detailed specifications:

            • The actual mnemonics of tools to be run (dependent on the contractor)
            • Intervals to be logged if different from the total openhole action
            • How the tools are to be combined to form the individual toolstrings
            • Data transmission/delivery requirements

               For the so-called conventional logs (i.e., GR, resistivity, sonic, density,
            neutron), it is not usually necessary to be very specific, since the company
            will have already established the tool parameters via generalized guide-
            lines, as discussed in Section 1.3 above. However, the type of resistivity
            tool to be used will depend on the drilling mud in the hole and the resis-
            tivities expected to be encountered. While only induction tools may be
            run in OBM, the optimum tool to be run in WBM will depend on the ratio
            of the mud filtrate resistivity (R mf) to the formation, or water, resistivity
            (R w). As a rule of thumb, an induction tool is preferred if the ratio of R mf
            to R w is more than 2. However, laterolog tools tend to be more accurate
            in highly resistive formations (resistivity at room temperature  >200
            ohmm) and are inaccurate below about 1ohmm. Induction tools, on the
            other hand, become saturated above 200ohmm but are more accurate in
            low-resistive formations. For formation imaging, resistivity tools cannot
            be used in OBM, although they are definitely preferred in WBM. When
            OBM is used, it is necessary to use an ultrasonic device.
               Usually the stations to be used for pressure/fluid sampling, VSP, and
            sidewall sampling will be dependent on the analyses made on the first
            run(s) in the hole. These stations may in some cases be picked on the well-
            site by the company’s representative but are usually determined in the
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28