Page 213 - Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
P. 213

Well Deviation, Surveying, and Geosteering  203

            1. What is the relative dip between the borehole and formation?
            2. If the direction of dip of the formation is the same as the borehole,
               what is the absolute formation dip?
            3. Suppose that it is known that the formation dip azimuth is at an angle
               of 40 degrees to the borehole trajectory. What is now the true forma-
               tion dip?



             13.4 HORIZONTAL WELLS DRILLED ABOVE A CONTACT


               Often there is a requirement to drill wells a fixed distance above a water
            contact in order to optimize drainage. In an ideal reservoir, which is homo-
            geneous, the contact would be at a fixed subsea depth, so in theory one
            would only need to keep the well at a certain TVD. In practice, contact
            depths may vary over a reservoir due to:

            • Capillary effects. If the rock quality (particularly permeability) varies,
               the oil/water contact (OWC) or gas/water contact (GWC) will vary,
               while the free water level (FWL) remains constant.
            • Depletion in the field. The contact may have moved due to aquifer influx
               or injection during production.
            • Depletion in neighboring fields. There may be observed an overall
               tilting of the contact in a certain direction due to offtake in a neigh-
               boring field affecting the aquifer.

               The position of the contact will typically have been determined through
            measurements made in nearby wells, and there may be some scatter in the
            interpreted contact depths due to surveying errors. Typically, this uncer-
            tainty will be on the order of 2–5m, although it may be greater if some
            wells are particularly anomalous. Borehole TVD uncertainty as a result
            of surveying errors, coupled with uncertainty in the true contact depth,
            will lead to an overall uncertainty as to the distance between the well and
            the contact. It may therefore be necessary for the petrophysicist to assess
            the well’s proximity to the contact or FWL via real-time measurements
            during drilling. The best way to do this is by using an established satura-
            tion/height function, calibrated against core in earlier wells.  Then the
            water saturation calculated in the horizontal well while drilling may be
            input to the model to back-calculate the height above the FWL. Once this
            is known, the OWC may be estimated by observing the entry height on
            the curve corresponding to the prevailing porosity and permeability.
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218