Page 159 - White Lives The Interplay of 'Race', Class, and Gender in Everyday Life
P. 159

152  How English am I?
              Englishness’. This suggests that Englishness was being understood more as
              an ethnicity than as a nationality:

                 You can claim any nationality you want as long as you believe that is
                 your nationality. I think you could, you could move to any country in
                 the world, and if you said this is where I want to stay, you can ...I
                 think nationality is an attitude of mind, I don’t think it’s anything more
                 practical than that. It gets bogged down in practicalities because of im-
                 migration and because of the way government treats people, but I actu-
                 ally think a sense of nationality is to do with society, and you could live
                 in a country for 40 years and never feel really part of it. You know, you
                 get ex-pats who’ve been living abroad for years and years and years, but
                 still absolutely see themselves as British. Or never see themselves as part
                 of that culture. And then you get other people who move out and within
                 6 months have absolutely adopted it, and said, ‘yes, this is it, this is the
                 place for me. And I feel part of it’. So, I think fundamentally it’s much
                 more to do with an attitude of mind. So, you know, I don’t know, I have
                 no idea and I wouldn’t wish to say to any racial group or individual
                 that they should or shouldn’t feel British. It’s up to them. You know, if
                 they’re here and they’re working, they’re paying taxes, they have every
                 right to be here. They’re putting money into the system like everybody
                 else is, and if they’re here for 2 years or 20 years, you know, that’s their
                 own individual choice really.
                                                                 (Interview 15)

                In the section above, Heather promoted a truly voluntaristic notion of
              national identity. Here, she is not concerned with the cultural identity she
              brought into her discussions of national history and cultural products. Never-
              theless, in the above account, nationality was more than the mere holding
              of a passport, it involved an intangible ‘attitude of mind’. She wanted to
              avoid ‘getting bogged down in practicalities’ of immigration – for Heather,
              nationality was more than a legal status. Nonetheless, while she wished to be
              open in allowing ‘any racial group or individual’ to ‘feel British’, she also set
              the criteria that they should ‘pay taxes’ and contribute. This was a complex
              and perhaps contradictory view of nationality – mixing as it does elements
              of ethnicity. It is unlikely that Heather would require white people born of
              British subjects to work and pay taxes before they could consider themselves
              British. The nature of this belonging was not very clear. What do you have
              to feel to feel British? When I went on to ask Heather whether the fact
              that many British people were not white had changed the meaning of the
              category itself, she appeared to continue to imply that white people remain
              the gatekeepers of British identity: ‘we’ are open-minded about ‘them’:

              BB:       But do you think ...I mean, I suppose the notion of what is
                        British, do you think it has changed in response to the fact that
                        there are a lot of non-white British people?
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164