Page 184 - Writing Winning Business Proposals
P. 184

Writing the Methods Slot                             175





                                 More or fewer P-slots need to be filled depending on . . .
                                 Your relationship with the  Your competition  Your sales objectives
                                 buyers                  • How many firms are   • To prequalify for the
                                 • What is the quality of that   competing?  next opportunity?
                                  relationship?          • How qualified are the  • To get to the next
                                 • How many previous studies   competitors?  level?
                                  have you done for their firm,  • To what extent have   • To win?
                                  and what was the result?  these competitors
                                 • What studies, known by   worked for the
                                  them, have you done for other   prospect before?
                                  firms, and what was the   • Is one of them the
                                  result?                 incumbent?




                            FIGURE 10.12   Considerations to determine if and how much the P-slots should be filledd
                            FI GU RE  1 0. 12    C o nsi d er a ti o ns t o   d et ermine i f   a n d  h o w m u ch the P -sl o ts sh ou l d   b e  fi  lle
                            In short, you’ve sold the job, and I’ve asked you for nothing more than a con-
                          firmation letter. As a result, you need to do very little with the P-slots. On the
                          task level, there might be little need to provide a rationale for each task and to
                          indicate the benefits of completing it. In fact, you might need to do nothing more
                          with the tasks than include them in a Gantt chart. On the methods-section level,
                          there might be little need to discuss the rationale for your specific approach. At
                          the document level, you might not even need to provide a rationale for why the
                          study should be done nor argue the benefits that will accrue from its doing.
                            Conversely, if five firms are competing and some of them have capabilities
                          equal to yours, and if they, not you, have worked successfully with me, your pro-
                          posal will have to be very persuasive indeed. Many of the P-slots will have to
                          be filled—and filled well. At each crucial point, you may have to explain why a
                          task is important to perform—and the results of its performance; why you have
                          designed your approach precisely as you have—and the value of your conducting
                          it; and why, from your point of view, the study should be performed—and the
                          benefits to be gained from your performing it.
                            In this second case, however, you should seriously consider not writing a pro-
                          posal at all, especially if my issue doesn’t play to your strengths or if I am not one
                          of your target clients or am not in one of your target industries. Instead, redeploy
                          your resources for some other battle you have a better chance to win.
                            The third category in Figure 10.12, “sales objectives,” is important because too
                          many proposal writers view the written proposal as having only one sales objective:
                          to close the deal. A good example of this proposal-as-last-effort viewpoint is the
                          requirement at some consulting firms (sometimes by fiat, sometimes by institutional
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189