Page 247 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 247

QC: IML/FFX
              P2: IML/FFX
  P1: IML/FFX
                                        T1: IML
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
                                           August 16, 2007
  AT029-05
            AT029-Manual
                                                                   TABLE 5.17—Mixing rules for MRK EOS parameters (Eqs. (5.38)
             TABLE 5.15—Evaluation of various EOS for prediction of liquid
                        density of heavy hydrocarbons [70].  17:42  5. PVT RELATIONS AND EQUATIONS OF STATE 227
                                                                                   and (5.137)–(5.140)).
                                                 %AAD                   ! ! j x i x j T  2  /P cij       1/2
                                                                         i
                                  No. of                           T cm = ! !  cij          T cij = T ci T c j  1 − k ij
             Compound           data points  MRK  RK  SRK  PR            i  j x i x j T cij /P cij
             n-Heptane (n-C 7 )    35     0.6  12.1  10.5  1.4            ! ! j x i x j T cij  /P cij     8T cij
                                                                                2
                                                                          i
             n-Nonane (n-C 9 )     35     0.6  15.5  13.4  3.4     P cm =   ! !       2    P cij =   (T cii /P cii ) 1/3 +(T c jj /P c jj) 1/3 3

             n-Undecane (n-C 11 )  35     1.7  18.0  15.5  5.4            i  j x i x j T cij /P cij
             n-Tridecane (n-C 13 )  30    2.8  20.3  17.7  7.9                                     1/3  1/3 3

             n-Heptadecane (n-C 17 )  30  1.2  27.3  24.8  16.0        ! !                       r ii  +r  jj
                                                                   r m =  i  j  x i x j r ij  r ij =  8
             n-Eicosane (n-C 20 )  20     2.8  29.5  26.7  18.2
             n-Triacontane (n-C 30 )  20  0.6  41.4  39.4  32.5
             n-Tetracontane (n-C 40 )  20  4.1  50.9  49.4  44.4
             Total                225     1.6  24.3  22.1  13.3   Predicted liquid densities from SRK and PR equations (Exam-
             MRK: Eqs. (5.38), (5.138), and (5.141). Note none of these data were used  ple 5.2) deviate from experimental data by +31.5 and 17.2%,
             in development of Eq. (5.139).                       respectively. Advantage of MRK over other cubic equations
                                                                  for liquid density is greater for heavier compounds as shown
            interesting point about this equation is that it can be used up  in Table 5.15.
            to C 40 for density estimations. Obviously this equation is not
            designed for VLE calculations as no VLE data were used to
            develop Eq. (5.139). Prediction of Z c from MRK EOS is shown  This modified version of RK EOS is developed only for den-
            in Table 5.14. Evaluation of MRK with PR and SRK equations  sity calculation of hydrocarbon systems and their mixtures.
            for prediction of liquid density of heavy hydrocarbons is given  It can be used directly to calculate density of petroleum frac-
            in Table 5.15. Data sources for these compounds are given in  tions, once M, d 20 , n 20 , T c , and P c are calculated from meth-
            Table 5.14. Overall results for prediction of density for both  ods discussed in Chapters 2 and 3. Moreover parameter r can
                                                                  be accurately estimated for heavy fractions, while prediction
            liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon compounds from C 1 to C 40
            is shown in Table 5.15. The overall error for the MRK EOS  of acentric factor for heavy compounds is not reliable (see
            for more than 1700 data points is about 1.3% in comparison  Figs. 2.20–2.22). The main characteristic of this equation is its
            with 4.6 for PR and 7.3 for SRK equations.            application to heavy hydrocarbons and undefined petroleum
              To apply this EOS to defined mixtures a set of mixing rules  fractions. The fact that Eq. (5.139) was developed based on
            are given in Table 5.17 [70]. For petroleum fractions parame-  data for hydrocarbons from C 2 to C 8 and it can well be used up
            ters can be directly calculated for the mixture. For binary and  to C 40 shows its extrapolation capability. The linear relation
                                                                  that exists between 1/β and parameter r makes its extrapo-
            ternary liquid mixtures containing compounds from C 1 to C 20
            an average error of 1.8% was obtained for 200 data points [70].  lation to heavier hydrocarbons possible. In fact it was found
            For the same dataset RK, SRK, and PR equations gave errors  that by changing the functionality of 1/β with r, better pre-
            of 15, 13, and 6%, respectively. Further characteristics and  diction of density is possible but the relation would no longer
            evaluations of this modified RK EOS are discussed by Riazi  be linear and its extrapolation to heavier compounds would
            and Roomi [71]. Application of this method in calculation of  be less accurate. For example, for C 17 and C 18 , if the constant
            density is shown in the following example.            0.02 in Eq. (5.139) is replaced by 0.018, the %AAD for these
                                                                  compounds reduces from 2 to 0.5%.
                                                                   Analysis of various EOS shows that use of refractive index
            Example 5.9—Repeat Example 5.2 for prediction of liquid
            and vapor density of n-octane using MRK EOS.          in obtaining constants of an EOS is a promising approach.
                                                                  Further work in this area should involve use of saturation
                                                                  pressure in addition to liquid density data to obtain relations
            Solution—The MRK EOS is to use Eq. (5.38) with parameters
            obtained from Eqs. (5.139)–(5.141). The input data needed to  for EOS parameters that would be suitable for both liquid
            use MRK EOS are T c , P c , and r. From Example 5.2, T c = 568.7  density and VLE calculations.
            K, P c = 24.9 bar, and T r = 0.9718 K. From Table 5.14 for
                                                       −4
            n-C 8 , r = 5.608. From Eq. (5.139), β = 1.5001 × 10 . From
                                   3                              5.10 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
            Eq. (5.139), b = 150.01 cm /mol and from Eq. (5.141), a =
                                2
                       7
                           6
            3.837982 × 10 cm /mol . Solving Eq. (5.42) with u 1 = 1 and
            u 2 = 0 (Table 5.1) and in a way similar to that performed in  In this chapter the fundamental of PVT relations and math-
                                                      3
                             L
                                          V
            Example 5.2 we get V = 295.8 and V = 1151.7cm /mol. De-  ematical EOS are presented. Once the PVT relation for a
            viations of predicted values from experimental data are –2.7%  fluid is known various physical and thermodynamic proper-
            and –5.3% for liquid and vapor molar volume, respectively.  ties can be determined as discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. In-
                                                                  termolecular forces and their importance in property predic-
               TABLE 5.16—Comparison of various EOSs for prediction of  tions were discussed in this chapter. For light hydrocarbons
                     density of liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons.  two-parameter potential energy relations such as LJ describes
                                              %AAD
                          No. of                                  the intermolecular forces and as a result two-parameter EOS
             Compound   data points  MRK   RK     SRK     PR      are sufficient to describe the PVT relation for such fluids. It is
             C 1 –C a 8   1520     1.3     4.9    5.1     3.3     shown that EOS parameters can be directly calculated from
             C 7 –C b     225      1.6    24.3   22.1    13.3
                 40                                               the potential energy relations. Criteria for correct EOS are
             Total        1745     1.33    7.38   7.28    4.59    given so that validity of any EOS can be analyzed. Three cat-
             a These are the compounds that have been marked as bold in Table 5.14 and
             are used in development of Eq. (5.139).              egory of EOSs are presented in this chapter: (1) cubic type,
             b These are the same compounds as in Table 5.15.     (2) noncubic type, and (3) generalized correlations.
                                                                         --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252