Page 84 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 84

QC: —/—
             P2: —/—
  P1: KVU/—
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
  AT029-02
            AT029-Manual
         64 CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
                             Critical Compersibility Factor  T1: IML  August 16, 2007  16:6























                                                           Carbon Number

                             FIG. 2.8—Estimation of critical compressibility factor of n-alkanes from various
                            methods.
         method for M, T c , and P c are given by Eqs. (2.93)–(2.95). In  with use of Eq. (2.10). Attempts to correlate ω with parame-
         part h, V c is calculated from the Hall–Yarborough through  ters such as T b and SG all have failed. However, for homolo-
         Eq. (2.100) and Z c is calculated through Eq. (2.8). Summary  gous hydrocarbon groups the acentric factor can be related to
         of results is given in Table 2.11. No judgement can be made  molecular weight as given by Eqs. (2.42) or (2.44). For other
         on accuracy of these different methods through this single-  compounds the acentric factor should be calculated through
         point evaluation. However, methods of Riazi–Sahhaf (Part d)  its definition, i.e., Eq. (2.10), with the use of a correlation to
         and Twu (Part g) give the most accurate results for this par-  estimate vapor pressure. Use of an accurate correlation for
         ticular case. The reason is that these methods have specific  vapor pressure would result in a more accurate correlation
         relations for n-alkanes family and n-hexatriacontane is hydro-  for the acentric factor. Methods of the calculation of the vapor
         carbon from this family. In addition, the values for the critical  pressure are discussed in Chapter 7. There are three simple
         properties from DIPPR [20] are estimated values rather than  correlations for the estimation of vapor pressure that can be
         true experimental values.                            used in Eq. (2.10) to derive corresponding correlations for the
                                                              acentric factor. These three methods are presented here.
         2.5.4 Prediction of Acentric Factor                  2.5.4.1 Lee–Kesler Method
         Acentric factor, ω, is a defined parameter that is not directly  They proposed the following relations for the estimation of
         measurable. Accurate values of the acentric factor can be ob-  acentric factor based on their proposed correlation for vapor
         tained through accurate values of T c , P c , and vapor pressure  pressure [27].

                                                                                       a
                      TABLE 2.11—Prediction of critical properties of n-hexatriacontane from different methods (Example 2.7).
                                                                                            3
                                             M              T c, K        P c, bar     V c ,cm /mol       Z c
         Part           Method(s)       Est. ∗∗  %D    Est.     %D     Est.   %D      Est.    %D      Est.   %D
              Data from DIPPR [20]      507.0   ···    874.0    ···    6.8     ···   2090.0    ···   0.196   ···
         a          R-D: Eq. (2.38)     445.6  −12.1   885.8    1.3    7.3      7.4  1894.4   −9.3   0.188   −4.2
         b          API Methods         512.7    1.1   879.3    0.6    7.37     8.4  1849.7  −11.5   0.205    4.6
         c          R−D (ext.): Eq. (2.46a)  ···  ···  870.3   −0.4    5.54  −18.5   1964.7   −6.0   0.150  −23.3
         d          R−S: Eqs. 2.42 &2.43  506.9  0     871.8   −0.3    5.93  −12.8   1952.5   −6.6   0.16   −18.4
         e          L−K Methods         508.1    0.2   935.1    7.0    5.15  −24.3   2425.9    16.0  0.161  −18.0
         f          Cavett & Eq. (2.104)  ···   ···    915.5    4.7    7.84    15.3    ···     ···    ···    ···
         g          Twu                 513.8    1.3   882.1    0.9    6.02  −11.4   2010.0   −3.8   0.165  −15.8
         h          Winn and H−Y        552.0    8.9   889.5     1.77  7.6     11.8  2362.9    13.1  0.243   24.0
         a The references for the methods are (a) R-D: Riazi–Daubert [28]; (b) API: Methods in the API-TDB [2]; (c) Extended Riazi–Dubert [65]; (d) Riazi–Sahhaf [31];
         (e) Kesler–Lee [12] and Lee–Kesler [27]; (f) Cavett [26]; Twu [31]; (h) Winn [25] and Hall–Yarborough [75]. Est.: Estimated value. %D: % relative deviation defined
         in Eq. (2.134).



                                                                                                                   --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---









   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89