Page 184 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 184

CULTURAL  THEORY  IN  POPULAR  CULTURE

            scenario  unified  us  ritually  and  re-awakened  our  sense  of  drama  and  the
            uniqueness of individual events. The televised funeral ritual celebrated unify-
            ing, emotional, symbolic objectifications of collective experience. It established
            order and defined roles as it restructured time and space. It o ffered a security
            blanket against the terror or boredom of mere profane existence. It celebrated
            central  tendencies  and  values  in  our  global  culture.  These  are  the  larger
            theoretical concepts that classical anthropological theory and popular culture
            theory have contributed. 5

                 The importance of ‘the popular’ and media celebrity

            ‘The popular’ today has the prominence the Church had in medieval society.
            In the broadest sense, all areas of life today relate to and are subsumed by a kind
            of media ‘noosphere’, to borrow a word from Teilhard de Chardin, that global
            mental and spiritual environment expressed in the bytes of media circulating
            everywhere and captured in human minds. Diana’s death and funeral illustrate
            the ways in which popular media play the traditional social role of the Church
            in today’s secular, pluralistic society.
              The canonized saint can be of the humblest origins and the slightest worldly
            accomplishments but is offered up for emulation as a role model for symbolic
            purposes: ‘Be like Saint Teresa.’ Today the media celebrity plays this role. ‘Be
            like Mike’ (Michael Jordan), that is, be delivered from your worldly miseries by
            losing yourself in his celebrity. Diana became a celebrity par excellence. Even
            when she separated herself from her largest claim on worldly power as the wife
            of England’s future king, she remained in the public eye and continued to be
            celebrated. She is a classic example of historian Daniel Boorstin’s observation
            that a modern celebrity is famous simply for being famous, that is, that ‘worldly
            achievement’ is not necessary to celebrity.
              The scale of Diana’s celebrity cannot be denied. During her life and death,
            she was featured on magazine covers in unprecedented numbers. Jacqueline
            Sharkey (1997: 20) notes, ‘Economic and technological developments made
            Diana’s image such a marketing force that broadcast network news operations
            devoted more time in one week to her fatal accident than to any news event
            since the 1991 coup attempt against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’. Her
            death was the number one news story of 1997 according to the Associated
            Press. Diana’s significance has been the subject of at least fifteen conferences.
            Opinion polls in the UK rank her as high as second among the twentieth
            century’s most important figures.
              Such celebrity as Diana’s, in many respects, achieves what canonization was
            intended  for,  role  modeling  and  relief  writ  large,  but  does  so  on  a  scale
            unimaginable to Church instruments of beatification and canonization. The
            number of people affected, however slightly, by the Diana phenomenon is a
            challenge to the theoretical imagination. Diana in life and death symbolized so
            many things to so many people – beauty, compassion, glamour, responsibility,

                                          173
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189