Page 186 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 186

CULTURAL  THEORY  IN  POPULAR  CULTURE

            through his Fox Network, Murdoch owns NFL football and NHL hockey. Via
            British-based  Foxtel,  British-based  BSkyB,  German-based  Vox,  Australian-
            based  Channel  Seven,  and  Hong-Kong-based  Star  TV,  Murdock  controls
            dominant television rights in one form or another to all major spectator sports:
            soccer, rugby, cricket, boxing, Australian football, auto racing, tennis, golf, bad-
            minton, motorcycling, table tennis, American football, and baseball (Rowe &
            McKay 1999).
              In fundamental ways, only a unified theory of culture, heavily indebted to
            popular culture theory, makes the three media/sport/cult books possible and
            coherent. One book, Sportcult, is organized around ‘building nations’ through
            studies  of  kung  fu  cinema  in  Tanzania  and  cricket  in  South  Africa  and  Sri
            Lanka, ‘building bodies’ through aerobics, bodybuilding, and wrestling, ‘buying
            and selling nations and bodies’ through ownership struggles, internationalized
            golf,  and  trash-talking  basketball,  and  ‘signifying  sport’  in  upward-mobility
            documentary, women sports journalists, and battles over sports trademarks. A
            second  book,  MediaSport,  examines  institutions,  texts,  and  audiences  of  the
            sports/media complex. The themes include games, commodification, market-
            place, race and gender, audiences, cyberspace, nationalism, and globalization.
            This last theme is developed most extensively in David Whitson’s ‘Circuits of
            promotion: Media, marketing and the globalization of sport’. Whitson  finds ‘a
            new kind of corporate integration in the media and entertainment industries’.
            At one level this means transnational investment and marketing on a global
            basis.  At  another  level  it  means  vertical  integration  between  ownership  of
            distribution media and ownership of popular entertainment properties. This
            represents a global ‘shift towards integrated corporate ownership of both con-
            tent and distribution’ (59). Similarly, Rowe’s examination of Sport, Culture and
            the Media revolves around his chapter on global political economy, ‘Money,
            myth  and  the  big  match:  The  political  economy  of  the  sports  media’.  The
            media sport text has become a valuable commodity, especially as economies
            have shifted away from material goods and direct services and towards control
            of information and images. Rowe represents a concern of recent important
            work in popular culture: ‘There is a marked globalizing trend in media sport
            which makes it increasingly hard to insulate any aspect of sport and media in
            any particular country from external, disruptive forces’ (1999: 75).
              Imagine nineteenth-century colonial anthropologists hearing their theories
            of non-rational tribal belief and behavior applied to global experiences touch-
            ing more than a billion people at once. They would be bewildered. The appli-
            cations of popular culture theory today explode the face-to-face scale of social
            analysis known to colonial anthropologists. Because of this, theories of classical
            myth and ritual must be complemented with theories of the media text and
            political economy and more. Popular culture cases today take us well beyond
            the limits of classical definitions and applications.




                                          175
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191