Page 217 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 217

STEPHEN  HINERMAN

             Popular actresses and actors pre-sold pictures to a considerable degree, assuring
             built-in  audiences  and  revenues  for  the  film  companies  and  their  financial
             backers.  Furthermore,  stars  as  professional  actors  were  generally  depend-
             able.  They  could  be  counted  upon  to  show  up  for  work,  deliver  first-rate
             performances, and work efficiently within a budget.
               The type of star chosen for a particular role also helped to move production
             along smoothly. Stars often achieved fame via particular genre roles. Studios
             routinely placed stars back into movies of the same genre, thereby enhancing
             predictability and audience loyalty (Dyer 1982: 53). Stars also made it possible
             for  the  studios  to  promote  films by developing an entirely new enterprise,
             ‘publicity’, around the star. Consumers could be enticed back into the theater
             because they were interested in the life of the stars outside their character roles.
             In fact, the very distinction between the public life of a star and the private life
             of the actor developed when stars were first used as the main means of mer-
             chandising films by their companies (DeCordova 1991: 26). King elaborates on
             the central importance of stardom to film production:


                 Not only is it possible to point to the fact that the star is central to the
                 raising of finance, as the least problematic advance guarantee of a cer-
                 tain level of audience interest. It is also relatively easy to detail the
                 various ways in which stars stabilize the process of representation itself
                 by  focusing  a  disparate  range  of  specialisms  and  narrational  inputs
                 around a relatively fixed nucleus of meaning, which is given in advance
                 of  any  specific  instance  of  narration  or,  for  that  matter,  context  of
                 production.  Likewise,  the  mobilization  of  publicity  and  advertising
                 around the moment of consumption of film itself – not to mention the
                 consumption of derived commodities such as fan magazines, fashions,
                 and consumer goods – relies on the star as cybernetic monitor which
                 returns all efforts to the same apparent core of meaning.
                                                           (King 1987: 149)

             Stardom  is  the  perfect  vehicle  for  cultural  production  in  a  mass-mediated,
             modern  world.  What  better  lure  than  consistent,  recognizable,  attractive,
             marketable commodities available for public display that can ensure relative
             predictability  in  a  business  that  is  historically  unpredictable?  Stars  deliver
             desired production values while they nearly guarantee a profit. Stars function
             instantaneously across media technologies and genres to introduce, glamorize,
             focus, and stabilize new cultural commodities, as well as media and cultural
             production itself. Many definitions of stardom take this anchoring function
             into account. For instance, Ellis’s definition of a star as ‘a performer in a particu-
             lar medium whose figure enters into subsidiary forms of circulation, and feeds
             back into future performances’ reflects this idea (Ellis 1982: 91).
               To look solely at the production side of stardom, however, misses a vital
             component of popular culture. We know from countless failed examples that it

                                           206
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222