Page 31 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 31

EDWARD  C.  STEWART

             With their hands, early human beings constructed pitchers for storing water,
             looms  for  weaving  cloth,  and  bows  and  arrows  for  killing  game.  The  pro-
             duction  and  use  of  these  three  artifacts,  as  well  as  an  in finite  number  of
             other artifacts endowed with hard material surfaces, left indelible marks on
             daily life.
               But Vygotsky considered language to be by far the supreme artifact operat-
             ing in human interaction. The material side of language – the sounds of speech
             – is software compared with, for instance, the hardware structure of a pitcher
             for storing water. But the ideal, conceptual side of language is incomparable to
             the  ideal  aspect  of  any  other  cultural  artifact.  Vygotsky  believed  that  word
             meaning is the unit of verbal thought, and that the primary function of the
             sounds of words in speech is to construct culture and to communicate with
             others in social interaction (Vygotsky 1962: vi–vii, 4–6).


                                       Mediated action
             When language is the specific tool that transforms internalities into speech, the
             process  can  be  labeled  ‘language-mediated  action’.  Such  actions  aimed  at
             others induce reactions, leading Vygotsky to believe that all communications
             tools  are  ultimately  based  on  assumptions  and  procedures  of  interpersonal
             exchange, and are heavily contextualized. The individual’s repertoire of socially
             enacted, tool-mediated actions constitutes his or her culture.
               The  action  mediated  by  the  tool  of  language  is  implied  in  the  Hannerz
             quotation, ‘the external forms that internalities take as they are made public’
             (Hannerz 1992: 3). In Vygotsky’s view, language is an integral part of cultural
             mediation.  As  an  artifact,  language  mediates  behavior  in  two  courses  of
             action: direct and instrumental. The consequence of the duality of application
             for  the  basic  structure  of  behavior  is  that  ‘instead  of  applying  directly  its
             natural function to the solution of a particular task’, an instrumental means
             intervenes  between  the  function  and  the  task,  by  the  medium  of  which  an
             individual is led to perform the task (Cole 1996: 108).
               We are talking about the cultural turn in psychology. Jerome Bruner calls
             the  new  psychology  ‘culturalism’  (Bruner  1996:  3).  Bruner’s  culturalism
             emphasizes  language-mediated  actions.  Its  development  is  linked  to  a  way
             of life where ‘reality’ exists in the form of symbolism – primarily language –
             shared  by  members  of  a  cultural  community  who  organize  and  construe  a
             technical-social way of life according to their symbolic expressions:

                 This symbolic mode is not only shared by a community, but conserved,
                 elaborated, and passed on to succeeding generations who, by virtue
                 of this transmission, continue to maintain the culture’s identity and
                 way of life. Culture in this sense is superorganic. But it shapes the minds
                 of  individuals  as  well.  Its  individual  expression  inheres  in  meaning
                 making, assigning meanings to things in different settings on particular

                                            20
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36