Page 28 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 28

CULTURE  OF  THE  MIND

            walls were usually armed and in pursuit of animals,  fighting one another, or
            dancing.
              The images’ vivid quality reveals the sacred nature and magical power of the
            great predators. Emotion and danger permeate the symbolic atmosphere repre-
            sented in the caves. The images seem to portray the animals from the inside –
            displaying their primal power – rather than from the outside, as the predator or
            prey would appear in real life. In contrast to the vivid and realistic depiction of
            animals, human forms often take a simpler form. They appear as stick figures
            such as hunters, warriors, and shamans.
              The universal rites of blood letting and the killing of animals as sacrifices
            were part of the rituals of magic that were invented to gain power over animals.
            Complex religious beliefs aimed at pain, fear, anger, and the need for power
            clearly underlie the content and distribution of cave art.
              Cave art offers evidence of warfare in the Paleolithic period too. From a
            cave in Spain, for example, archers fight archers with each one depicted as a
            kinetic stick figure. The stick limbs of all archers are lengthened, because in the
            act of running they feel long. The stylization works; the figures are dynamic.
            From the right side, three archers on the run close in on a single archer who is
            dashing towards them from the left side. A second archer runs behind from the
            left to support the forward archer threatened by encirclement. At a greater
            distance, three other supporting archers run toward the central fracas from the
            left side.


                           The politics of cultural relativism
            Edward O. Wilson attributes the low explanatory power of the social sciences
            to the fact that social scientists spurn the idea of the hierarchical ordering
            of knowledge that unites and drives the natural sciences. He insists that a sci-
            ence can be valid only with ‘consilience’, the interlocking of causal explan-
            ations  across  disciplines.  Physiological  psychology  founded  on  biology,  for
            example, has taken huge strides in its knowledge base primarily because it has
            begun to interlock causal explanations at the molecular, cellular, and organic
            levels of the organism. The natural sciences have constructed a network of
            causal  explanation  that  begins  with  quantum  physics  and  extends  to  the
            brain  sciences.  They  have  also  examined  deep  origins  which,  in  the  case
            of  physiological  psychology,  are  isolated  in  evolutionary  biology  (Wilson
            1998: 125).
              The explanatory network now reaches the edge of culture, where it enters
            and engenders a state of confusion. The anthropologist Franz Boas, aided by his
            famous students Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead, led a crusade against the
            threat of eugenics and racism many people believe to be implicit in Social
            Darwinism. ‘With caution swept aside by moral zeal’, they created the new
            ideology  of  cultural  relativism,  believing  that  all  cultures  are  equal  but  in
            different ways. This position supports the politics of multiculturalism in the

                                          17
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33