Page 37 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 37

EDWARD  C.  STEWART

             from adrenaline released into the bloodstream. The body, it was reasoned, takes
             the lead, perhaps playing the only role in the experience of emotion (James
             1952: 738–66).
               Today it is accepted that bodily reactions play an important part in creating
             and sustaining emotions. Models of the brain now show how the brain influ-
             ences  emotion.  Scientists  have  demonstrated  that  the  limbic  system  and
             the right hemisphere of the brain are involved in mediating emotional feelings
             and behavior. Even so, human feelings are too complicated to be reduced to
             hormonal and neural activity. In addition to the autonomic arousal in emotion,
             ‘attention and scanning mechanisms are directed towards important aspects of
             the environment’ and alerting and marking mechanisms identify events that are
             important  (Mandler  1987:  220).  Cognitive  evaluations  of  both  the  exciting
             event and of the bodily reactions are crucial elements in mediating emotional
             feelings.
               In the field of cross-cultural psychology, emotions captured the attention of
             the experimental psychologist Charles Osgood and his colleagues (1975), who
             pioneered a massive classic study of the universals of a ffective meaning based on
             single words – the Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Subjects from
             many cultures rated a list of words used to measure their a ffective meanings. In
             this way, Osgood collected information on cultural feelings towards particular
             words. The hypothesis driving the study was that regardless of language or
             culture, human beings throughout the world use the same qualifying emotional
             framework to allocate affective meaning to concepts (Osgood et al. 1975: 6).
             The study is a monumental effort to construct a universal culture of the type I
             call ‘nuclear culture’.
               Following in the tradition of the universal culture of emotion, the psycholo-
             gist  Paul  Ekman  identified  six  basic  universal  emotions:  happiness,  sadness,
             anger, fear, disgust, and surprise (Ekman, Friesen and Ellsworth 1972). Each of
             the six emotions has a distinctive physiological pattern among all peoples in
             body temperature, blood pressure, muscle tone, body agitation, and perceptual
             accuracy.  The  receptor  organs  for  warmth,  pressure,  movement,  and  all  the
             other  sensory  impressions  convert  sensory  stimulation  into  electric  impulses
             which stream to the brain, where neuronal  firing  is  organized  into  a  single
             pattern, such as anger.
               None the less, more recently Anna Wierzbicka in Emotion and Culture (1994)
             confronts what she calls the ‘shallow universalism’ of the idea that a ‘ finite set
             of discrete and universal basic human emotions can be identi fied by English
             words’. Continuing the thought:

                 Cross-cultural  lexical  research  undertaken  by  linguists  and  anthro-
                 pologists demonstrates that concepts such as happy or angry are not
                 universal, but constitute cultural artifacts of Anglo culture re flected in,
                 and continually reinforced by, the English language . . . Another con-
                 clusion emerging from this research is that the set of emotion terms

                                            26
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42