Page 246 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 246

230  4 Life Cycle Impact Assessment

                    Land uses of high impact and frequently applied in LCAs are cultivated areas
                    particularly of agriculture and forestry, mining areas (especially open cast mining),
                    traffic and dumping areas.
                      The collection of this information in the inventory can be quite laborious.
                    Land use with relevant environmental impacts is however of great importance
                    for both LCAs on nutrition and on renewable raw materials and should under
                    no circumstances be neglected. Examples of renewable raw materials playing an
                    important role in many product systems are wood (e.g. building products and
                    cardboard, paper), oil seeds, sugar cane, sugar beet (e.g. fuel and lubricant) or corn
                    (input material for agragas plants). 143)  In addition, infrastructure areas including
                    traffic routes and flooded areas for hydro-electric power plants are to be considered.
                    In the latter case ongoing releases for many years of CO and CH by decomposition
                                                              2
                                                                     4
                    of flooded biomass must also be considered (see ‘Climate change’).
                      As soon as every area is quantified by space (F ) and the utilisation period is
                                                            i
                    determined, the impact indicator is formed by multiplication. Areas of the same
                    hemerobic level are added up (Equation 4.10), the results of different hemerobic
                    levels are however not aggregated.
                                                               2
                                                                    −1
                      Area specifications for relevant inventory data (m afU ) if necessary by
                    conversion or estimation must be assigned to the selected hemerobic level of the
                    impact assessment. Without further aggregation this results in

                         Land use =  ∑ (F × utilisation period)(m a)
                                                          2
                                       i
                                    i
                           (for each hemerobic level) i                        (4.10)

                       F : area of hemerobic level i (1–7) per fU
                        i
                       Utilisation period: time used to produce the quantity of material or energy
                         needed per fU.
                    The evaluation according to Equation 4.10 thus does not provide a total ‘naturalness
                    score’.
                      Brentrup et al. (2002b, loc. cit.) define a ‘naturalness degradation potential (NDP)’
                    linearly increasing with hemerobic level from zero (hemerobic level 1 = H0) to one
                    (hemerobic level 7 = H10) in order to obtain a cardinal scale. The designations
                    H0 to H10 refer to the 11-level scale preferred by the authors. Similar to most
                    scoring systems this weighting is arbitrary and serves only for a better adap-
                    tion to the usual characterisation applied in other impact categories (inventory
                    result × characterising factor = impact indicator result). Following the arguments
                    of the authors the NDP (i = type of use) can be used as characterisation factor for
                    area × time (Equation 4.11):
                         NDI =  ∑ (F × duration of use i) NDP (m a)            (4.11)
                                                           2
                                                       i
                                   i
                                i
                    143) Faulstich and Greiff (2008).
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251