Page 250 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 250

234  4 Life Cycle Impact Assessment

                    • Quantification has to be done at the starting point of the impact hierarchy
                      for global categories because only based on these, can relatively secure model
                      calculations be accomplished (these are typical mid-point categories).
                    For these reasons global impact categories are considered to be of greater objectivity
                    than others. 163)  As for regional impact categories there are requirements for a
                    stronger consideration of geographical release, distribution, and impact modes
                    even if this implies higher requirements in the inventory. 164) .

                    4.5.2.2  Climate Change


                        The waves of heat speed from our earth through the atmosphere towards space.
                        These waves dash in their passage against the atoms of oxygen and nitrogen, and
                        against the molecules of aqueous vapour. Thinly scattered as these latter are, we
                        might naturally think meanly of them, as barriers to the waves of heat.
                                                                 (John Tyndall 1863.) 165)
                      There is worldwide a broad consensus on the impact category climate change
                    and its quantification. However, characterisation factors slightly change with time
                    as shown in reports published by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
                    Change) 166) , especially owing to varying knowledge and subsequent assessments of
                    indirect impacts. This is a common scientific process: we thereby apprehend that
                    science approaches ‘truth’ at best, without ever, according to Popper, 167)  reaching it.
                      The following can be learned from the category climate change for development
                    of methods in LCIA:
                    • Quantification of the selected indicator in a form suited for LCA, here as GWP;
                    • Deduction of scientific relations including equivalence factors in specialised
                      disciplines;
                    • Thorough scrutinising of the methods by an international Peer Review;
                    • Publication of results on behalf of a respected scientific committee (IPCC), which
                      is accountable to the United Nations only.

                    To the first point: this turned out by chance, because usability of the GWP for
                    LCIA was surely the last thing the IPCC was concerned about. To the second:
                    LCA practitioners are often generalists and should delegate an elaboration of
                    indicators plus quantification to specialists. Unfortunately their proposals are often
                    unfeasible because they are usually not familiar with the LCA methodology. 168)  The



                    163) Owens (1996, 1998).
                    164) Potting and Hauschild (1997a,b), Owens (1997), Bare, Pennington and Udo de Haes (1999) and
                        Potting et al. (2001, 2002).
                    165) Tyndall (1873). (first edition 1863; the discovery of the natural greenhouse effect by Tyndall dates
                        back to 1859 after predictions by Joseph Fourier 1824 and Claude Pouillet 1827).
                    166) IPCC (1990, 1992, 1995a, 2001, 2007).
                    167) Popper (1934).
                    168) Fava et al. (1993).
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255