Page 28 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 28

12  1 Introduction

                      The phases of LCA have been renamed, compared to earlier structures, and the
                    following terms are now internationally mandatory:
                    • Goal and Scope Definition
                    • Life Cycle Inventory Analysis
                    • Life Cycle Impact Assessment
                    • Interpretation.

                      The arrows in Figure 1.4 allow an iterative approach that is often neces-
                    sary (see Chapter 2). Direct applications of an LCA lie out of scope of the
                    standardised components of an LCA. This makes sense because, besides foreseeable
                    applications during the standardisation process, others were developed in practice
                    and have been summarised as ‘other applications’. Examples can be found in
                    Table 1.1.


                    1.3.3
                    Valuation – a Separate Phase?

                    A special status is attached to the former component valuation, 54)  which has not
                    been assigned in the standardised structure. A valuation is always necessary when
                    the results of a comparative LCA are not straightforward. A trade-off of system
                    A against system B needs to be made when, for example, the former has lower
                    energy consumption, but on the other hand has releases of substances leading to
                    water eutrophication and to the formation of near-ground ozone: What is of greater
                    importance? For these decisions, subjective and/or normative notions of value
                    are necessary, common in daily life, for example, during purchase decisions. 55)
                    For this reason, a valuation based on exact scientific methods cannot be made.
                    Therefore, it was proposed by SETAC Europe at Leiden 1991 56)  to introduce
                    valuation as a component of its own. This proposition was seized by UBA Berlin 57)
                    and by DIN-NAGUS 58)  later on. However, because subjective notions of value
                    cannot be standardised, a methodology was developed to support the process of
                    conclusion. In the SETAC ‘Code of Practice’ 59)  these methodological rules were
                    subordinated to the phase ‘Impact Assessment’. No changes were made by the
                    standardisation process of ISO: Methodological rules are integrated into the phase
                    ‘Impact Assessment’ 60)  (see Section 4.3). The final survey of results that leads to a
                    conclusion is supposed to take place in the final phase of an LCA, ‘Interpretation’ 62)
                             61)
                    (see Chapter 5).

                    54)  In German: Bewertung.
                    55)  DIN-NAGUS (1994), Giegrich et al. (1995), Kl¨ opffer and Volkwein (1995) and Neitzel (1996).
                    56)  SETAC Europe (1992).
                    57)  Schmitz, Oels and Tiedemann (1995).
                    58)  (DIN NAGUS (1994) and Neitzel (1996).
                    59)  SETAC (1993a).
                    60)  ISO (2000a).
                    61)  Grahl and Schmincke (1996).
                    62)  ISO (2000b).
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33