Page 390 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

374 6 From LCA to Sustainability Assessment

Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R., and Ugaya, C.M.L., Sonnemann, G. and
Jasch, D. (eds) (2008) Environmental Man- Hildenbrand, J.). UNEP-DTIE, Paris,
agement Accounting for Cleaner Production, http://lcinitiative.unep.fr ISBN: 978-92-807-
Springer, Dordrecht. 3175-0.
SETAC (2008) Environmental Life Cycle Cost- Weidema, B. (2001) Avoiding co-product allo-
ing (eds Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., cation in life-cycle assessment. J. Indust.
and Rebitzer, G.). Pensacola, FL, in col- Ecology, 4 (3), 11–33.
laboration with CRC Press, Boca Raton, Weidema, B.P. (2006) The integration of
FL. economic and social aspects in life cycle
SETAC (2011) Swarr, T.E., Hunkeler, D., impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess,
Kl¨ opffer, W., Pesonen, H.-L., Ciroth, A., 11 (Suppl. 1), 89–96.
Brent, A.C., and Pagan, R.) Environmen- White, A.L., Savage, D., and Shapiro, K.
tal Life Cycle Costing: A Code of Practice, (1996) Life-cycle costing: concepts and
SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL. application, in Environmental Life-Cycle
SETAC Globe (2002) 3 (4), 59. Assessment (ed. M.A. Curran), Chapter
Shapiro, K.G. (2001) Incorporating Costs 7, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 7.1–7.19
in LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 6 (2), ISBN 0-07-015063-X.
121–123. Wilson, E.O. (2006) The Creation. An Appeal
Society of Environmental Toxicology and to Save Life on Earth, W.W. Norton, New
Chemistry – Europe (Ed.) (1992) Life- York.
Cycle Assessment. Workshop Report, 2-3 World Commission on Environment and
December 1991, Leiden, SETAC-Europe, Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common
Brussels. Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Wrisberg, N., Udo de Haes, H.A.,
Chemistry (SETAC) (1993) Guidelines for Triebswetter, U., Eder, P., and Clift, R.
Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’, (eds) (2002) Analytical Tools for Envi-
1st edn. From the SETAC Workshop held ronmental Design and Management in a
at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March – 3 April Systems Perspective – The Combined Use
1993., SETAC, Brussels and Pensacola, FL, of Analytical Tools, Kluwer Academic
August 1993. Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
Steward, M. and Weidema, B. (2004) A Zamagni, A., Buttol, P., Buonamici, R.,
consistent framework for assessing the Masoni, P.; Guin´ ee, J.B., Huppes, G.,
impacts from resource use. A focus on Heijungs, R., van der Voet, E., Ekvall,
resource functionality. Int. J. Life Cycle T. and Rydberg, T. (2009) Co-ordination
Assess, 10 (4), 240–247. Action for innovation in Life-Cycle Analy-
Suh, S. (2003) Input-output and hybrid life sis for Sustainability. D20 Blue Paper on
cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 8 Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. Deliver-
(5), 257. able 20 of Work Package 7 of the CALCAS
Swarr, T.E., Hunkeler, D., Kl¨ opffer, W., project. Revision 1 after the open consul-
Pesonen, H.-L., Ciroth, A., Brent, A.C., tation, August 2009, http://www.estis.net
and Pagan, R. (2011) Environmental life (accessed 15 October 2013).
cycle costing: a code of practice. Editorial. Zamagni, A., Pesonen, H.-L., and Swarr, Th.
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16 (5), 389–391. (2013) Life cycle sustainability assessment:
UNEP-DTIE (2011) Towards a Life Cycle Sus- From LCA to LCSA. Special issue. Int. J.
tainability Assessment – Making Informed Life Cycle Assess., 18 (9), 1637–1803.
Choices on products (eds Valdivia, S.,