Page 18 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 18

1




           Introduction












           1.1   Background and Objectives
           The hazardous waste management business has steadily increased since the
           mid-1970s as public concern led to a vast range of new and stringent envi-
           ronmental regulations. With regard to groundwater and soil, a substantial
           amount of time and expense has been devoted to studying impacted sites,
           with much of the effort dedicated to litigation to determine the financially
           responsible parties. However, the focus has switched in recent years from lit-
           igation and site assessment to remediation. Site restoration usually proceeds
           through several phases and requires a concerted, multidisciplinary effort.
           Thus, remediation professionals come from a variety of technical and educa-
           tional backgrounds, including geology, hydrology, chemistry, microbiology,
           meteorology, toxicology and epidemiology, as well as chemical, mechanical,
           electrical, industrial, civil, and environmental engineering. Because of dif-
           ferences in the formal education and training of these professionals, their
           ability to perform or review remediation design calculations varies consider-
           ably. For some, performing accurate design calculations for site remediation
           can become a seemingly insurmountable task.
             Groundwater and soil remediation is more complicated than the conven-
           tional water and wastewater treatment because characteristics of soil and
           subsurface geology/hydrogeology greatly affect the implementability and
           effectiveness of a given technology. The absence of uniformly trained spe-
           cialists is exacerbated by the continuously evolving remediation technolo-
           gies. While up-to-date design information is sporadically published in the
           literature, it is usually theoretical in nature, and illustrative applications are
           rarely given. Most, if not all, of the books dealing with site remediation pro-
           vide only descriptive information on remedial technologies, and none, in
           this author’s opinion, provide helpful guidance on illustrations of practical
           design calculations.
             Selection of a proper remedial alternative is site-specific. One needs to
           know the applicability and limitations of each technology before a smart
           decision can be made. In addition to knowing how a remedial technology
           works, it is more important to know why it may not work for an impacted site.

                                                                              1
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23