Page 145 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 145

9781412934633-Chap-08  1/10/09  10:52 AM  Page 116





                   116               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   these remarks allow us to note a decisive  sudden changes. However, both recognize
                   characteristic of social life: the consensual  that the flexibility of a given societal system
                   nature of conflict and war, and the antagonis-  can induce gradual and/or violent change.
                   tic nature of order and peace.  Aron’s full  When we return to current political situa-
                   meaning is shown in his proposal (1963) of a  tions, it is an essential task of international
                   third alternative to war, namely peace  political and social development measures to
                   through power equilibrium.  This situation  try to maintain and fortify state structures in
                   can be explained, on the one hand, by the  order to prevent the collapse and the degen-
                   consensus of power blocs on minimal rules  eration of states which may cause political
                   of behaviour and on limits to spheres of  conflicts. Without development, ethnic con-
                   influence and, on the other hand, by an   flicts may not end.  Therefore, many states
                   equilibrium in the possession of weapons   are dependent on external aid measures that
                   of deterrence (for example the Cold  War   permit them to democratize, decentralize and
                   situation).                             demilitarize societies successfully. A desire
                     Treaties on rules of behaviour may control  for self-determination, a lack of opportunities
                   conflicts and conflicts may have positive  for political and economic participation,
                   consequences for the further existence of a  undermining the maintenance of a particular
                   society; but the history of most societies pro-  cultural identity, etc., may cause conflicts
                   vides many examples that relations between  that are expressed in power struggles of com-
                   members of societies, based on norms, may  peting elites for the control of the state and of
                   be founded on force and rule, and may   its material resources. In such situations, the
                   develop a great potential that can lead to con-  cultivation of ethnic and religious identities
                   flict and change.                       helps to create images of enemies. Political
                     To conclude, we are able to show that the-  entrepreneurs (two examples are those in the
                   oreticians of conflict locate the origin of  Democratic Republic of Congo and in the
                   social contradictions, conflicts and social  Ivory Coast) do not hesitate to mobilize a
                   change in the redistribution of power.  This  politicized ethnicity as an instrument for
                   may be economic, political or status power,  their conquest of power. 4
                   or the ‘cultural’ power to define goals and
                   norms. Conflicts between those who control
                   access to scarce and valuable resources of a  On wars and development
                   society and those who wish to have a greater
                   share in these resources induce significant  Classical theories of war and development
                   changes.  While social structures may be  have produced a statistically-based theory
                   explained by behaviours that result from   known as the ‘Phoenix Factor’ (Strakes,
                   different types of available societal resources,  2006: 1677). This theory states that a country
                   social change results from movements within  that is defeated in a world war will catch up
                   these possibilities or from preceding con-  and eventually overtake the victor as its post-
                   flicts (Collins, 1975: 61, 89).  To simplify,  war development accelerates. In the frame-
                   one could describe non-Marxist theoreticians  work of this theory, it is the country’s
                   of conflict as proponents of a cyclical con-  domestic economic performance that is
                   flict theory, because they consider conflict  important for its recovery and not the provi-
                   and rule of law as universal. By contrast,  sion of foreign aid. In fact, this theory may
                   Marx and his followers present a dynamic  apply to the great powerful nations, but not to
                   and evolutionary conflict theory. They con-  the majority of developing countries faced
                   sider conflicts as necessary for social change.  with different structural problems inside and
                   The first theory speaks of gradual change as  outside their region. Conflicts may even be
                   a consequence of conflicts and the second  perpetuated here when there is a lack of
                   theory sees conflicts as the triggers for  effective means of dispute resolution.
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150