Page 155 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 155

9781412934633-Chap-09  1/10/09  8:44 AM  Page 126





                   126               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   Both Durkheim and Engels marked out a   of deviance, and used medicine as a case
                   new perspective for looking at health: the  study in what we might now call ‘soft polic-
                   social-causation perspective. This perspective  ing’. The sick role offered a space to people
                   suggests that health is a value that is related  whose deviance was unintended, but the
                   to social factors and unevenly distributed in  impersonal physician served as a gatekeeper
                   society. The themes of cooperation and con-  to prevent its various exemptions and claims
                   flict appear in the work of both authors,  on others from being abused, and thereby
                   although their focus was on the broader  disrupting the smooth running of society.
                   workings of society rather than on the phe-  While this was often read in the 1950s and
                   nomena of health and illness per se. Harriet  1960s as an expression of cooperation and
                   Martineau, who was a contemporary of    consensus as the values underlying the social
                   Engels, found a more central place for health  institution of medicine, we might now prefer
                   in her sociology.  A medical sociologist  to see it as a joint process of managing a dis-
                   before the term was coined, Martineau not  ruption of the social order.
                   only shared Engels’ and concerns with the
                   relationship between work and health and
                   what the status of a community could tell us  The interactionist and social
                   about its morals (or social convictions of  constructionist perspective
                   right and wrong) (Martineau, 1838, 1861),
                   but extended her interest to encompass   Parsons may have pioneered the field, but
                   the experience of illness and a critical analy-  there were competing perspectives presented
                   sis of the relationship between the medi-  by the disciples of the Chicago School of soci-
                   cal profession and the laity (Martineau,  ology from the start. This perspective has con-
                   1844/2003).                             tinued as the interactionist and social
                     When modern sociology emerged, health  constructionist tradition in the field of medical
                   was included in some of the early classics.  and health sociology. In the American context,
                   For example, Robert and Helen Lynd (1937)  Everett Hughes (1958) and his students,
                   discuss public health and the politics of med-  notably Howard Becker (Becker et al., 1961),
                   ical provision in the second of their famous  introduced the themes of competition and
                   Middletown studies, but this work did not  negotiation in the description and analysis of
                   generate a legacy of further research. Credit  the socialization of the medical student, the
                   is, then, usually given to Talcott Parsons as  work of the physician, and work with clients.
                   the first major sociologist to devote sustained  This was taken up in the influential work of
                   attention to medicine as a social institution  Anselm Strauss and colleagues, who empha-
                   that, like religion and work, regulates certain  sized the ‘negotiated order’ of the hospital and
                   kinds of behaviour in modern society.   medical work (e.g., Strauss et  al., 1963).
                   Medical sociologists often depict Parsons as  Working within the same broad tradition,
                   a conservative figure, because of their lack of  Erving Goffman (1959) and Eliot Freidson
                   attention to the more recent scholarship on  (1970) also elaborated the Parsonian view of the
                   his life and work (e.g., Camic, 1991;   sick role and of the role and power of the physi-
                   Gerhardt, 2002). However, his experiences of  cian. It is important not to overstate the opposi-
                   the 1930s depression in the US, and his first-  tion between interactionist and Parsonian
                   hand observation of the rise of Nazism in  approaches: both Goffman and Freidson
                   Germany, gave him a powerful sense of the  reworked Parsons’s penetrating insights into the
                   fragility of social order.  The Social System  issues raised by sickness for sustaining the eco-
                   (Parsons, 1951) was his attempt to explain  nomic, political, and moral order of societies
                   how societies could sustain a sufficient  into different theoretical contexts. But both
                   degree of order to survive through time. He  acknowledged its fundamental relevance to the
                   had a particular interest in the management  programme of medical sociology.
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160