Page 359 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 359

9781412934633-Chap-22  1/10/09  8:54 AM  Page 330





                   330               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   more than half and the richest 10% accounted  world domination, a ‘decentered and deterri-
                   for 85%. Meanwhile, the bottom half of the  torializing apparatus of rule’ (Hardt and
                   world adult population owned barely 1% of  Negri, 2000: xii), a world market that
                   global wealth (Davies et al., 2006).    includes less than one-fifth of the world pop-
                     The global movement of capital in the  ulation, an exclusive club that defines mem-
                   post-Cold War era has been a very selective  bership as privilege.
                   process, creating islands of integrated com-  Access to food is still regarded by many as
                   munities and territories, while leaving many  a privilege rather than as a basic human right,
                   others marginalized (Bauman, 1998; Conway  and hunger and malnutrition prevail. Ill effects
                   and Heynen, 2006; Ghosh and Guven, 2006;  of malnutrition hurt even larger numbers of
                   Kennedy and Danks, 2001; Perrons, 2004).  people, mainly children, women and the
                   The boundaries of development and under-  elderly. Far from disappearing, hunger and
                   development, inclusion and exclusion are   malnutrition are on the increase, even in
                   no longer necessarily formed along the  advanced industrialized countries like Canada
                   north-south axis, but at the community level  with a relatively effective social safety net
                   (spatially as well as socially) all around the  (Riches, 1997).  The National Population
                   globe (Amin, 2006; Frieden, 2006; Geyer,  Health Survey (NPHS) released by Statistics
                   2006). Conditions of membership in the  Canada indicates that about 15% of Canadians
                   global economy, foreign aid, free trade   were considered to be living in a ‘food-inse-
                   partnerships, preferential status by interna-  cure’ household at some point during 2000/01
                   tional agencies and investment opportunities  (Statistics Canada, 2005). These figures show
                   are tied to membership status. Nations,  a significant jump over the figures from the
                   ethnic groups, regions and cities compete for  previous survey which claimed that 10.2% of
                   global membership status. Being the ‘other’  Canadian population was food insecure. The
                   in this process has become an increasingly  Canadian Association of Food Banks (CAFB,
                   heavy burden.                           2006) reported that 753,458 people used a
                     In 1996, at the World Food Summit (WFS)  food bank in a typical month in 2006.
                   in Rome,  World leaders admitted that   The United States Department of Agriculture
                   approximately 800 million people around the  (USDA) reported that about 12.6 million
                   world did not have enough to feed them-  American families worried that they couldn’t
                   selves and their families (Koc and MacRae,  afford to buy food (Nord et al., 2006). People
                   2001). A commitment was made to reduce  living on low incomes, recipients of social
                   the number of hungry people by half by 2015  assistance, the elderly, single mothers,
                   at the WFS, but this commitment was later  children of lone parents and  Aboriginal
                   considered to be unattainable. At the follow-  people, as well as ethnic minorities face a
                   up conference in Rome that met in June 2002,  much higher risk of food insecurity than the
                   the Food and Agricultural Organization of the  general population.
                   United Nations (FAO) changed its projection  Many observers argue that food insecurity
                   to reduce hunger to 440 million by 2030, still  has little to do with lack of food (Lappé and
                   above the original 2015 target.         Lappé, 2002). FAO (2002) sources indicate
                     In the emerging new-world order in the  that on a global scale 17% more calories are
                   early twenty-first century, there appears to be  produced per person today than three
                   an abandonment of the commitment to co-  decades ago, despite a 70% population
                   operation, universalism and developmental-  increase. This amount is estimated to offer an
                   ism, key characteristics that made modernity  average of 2,720 kilocalories (kcal) per
                   appealing to wider masses. The ‘empire’, as  person per day. In fact, a significant propor-
                   Hardt and Negri (2000) attempt to describe  tion of agricultural produce is being used
                   it, is not a republic built upon the ideals of  as animal feed or industrial products such
                   liberté, égalité, fraternité, but a project of  as gasoline, biodiesel, lubricants and other
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364