Page 390 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 390

9781412934633-Chap-24  1/10/09  8:55 AM  Page 361





                                             SOCIAL JUSTICE IN LATIN AMERICA                 361


                      government, and then to create public policies ...  extremely complex in the actual political
                      so things can be reversed and it becomes possible  dynamic.  The popular sectors in Latin
                      to work efficiently, and to get involved with the  America have historically engaged in diverse
                      people’s health ... their basic needs ... (Case S5.
                      Male leader of a student association in   ‘multi-class’ alliances, which may include
                      El Salvador).                         the intellectuals, the army, nationalist entre-
                                                            preneurs, etc. Certain members of these elites
                      The fourth question (‘Who speaks on   have actually become the ‘representatives’ of
                    behalf of the people?’) raises the issue of col-  the people at different times and in different
                    lective identity and political representation.  contexts. While the first question deals with
                    The idea of the ‘people’ is given in public  the representation of ‘Us’ as victims of injus-
                    discourse in Latin America. Never precisely  tice, the fourth question brings the respon-
                    defined, it usually refers to the majority of  dents to express their perception of the
                    the population as it stands outside –  and  ‘popular’ sectors as organized actors in the
                    against –  the ruling classes, that is, the rich  socio-political arena. Table 24.4 shows that
                    and powerful groups and families (some-  the national situation affected the kind of
                    times seen as intertwined with foreign inter-  response we got. In El Salvador, for example,
                    ests and thus alienated from the national  the presidential election made activists more
                    community). But this dichotomy becomes  aware of the right-left divide and of the political


                    Table 24.4  ‘Who speaks on behalf of the people?’
                              EL SALVADOR                               HONDURAS
                    WORD         TF      PF       Z         WORD         TF        PF       Z
                    the Church   57      44      24         the Church   61        53      35
                    voice        31      25      15         labour unions  42      28      14
                    the poor    106      53      15         voice        27        21      13
                    organizations  85    44      14         leadership   32        22      11
                    leadership   26      21      13         the poor     94        37       8
                    leaders      27      20      11         Catholic     14        11       7
                    Catholic     19      15       9         Bloque popular  31     17       7
                    Monseñor Romero 17   13       8         organizations  119     41       7
                    FMLN         93      32       5         proposals    14        11       7
                    ballot       19      11       5         truth       431       102       6
                    obtains      11       8       5         role         28        15       6
                    (to) change  30      15       5         force        36        16       5
                    plan         35      16       5         movement     88        27       4
                    (to) vote    14       8       4         I           232        57       4
                    (Handal) Schafik  16  9       4         actions      30        11       3
                    (to) mention  20     10       4         CGT          28        10       3
                    the left     65      23       4         (we) believe  59       17       3
                    (we) can     72      23       4         our          57        16       3
                    defense      13       8       4         labour union  47       14       3
                    leader       13       8       4         parties      31        12       3
                    churches     11       7       4         NGOs         20        9        3
                    message      11       7       4         ability      18        8        3
                    politicians  35      14       4         leaders      16        8        3
                    unions       16       7       3         we          460        95       3
                    (we) see     42      15       3         (ordinary) people  190  44      3
                    the right    57      18       3         (I) believe  104       27       3
                    party       124      32       3
                    campaign     13       7       3
                    TF: Total Frequency – number of times a given word appears in the activists’ discourse as a whole;
                    PF: Partial Frequency – number of times a given word is used by activists to respond to a specific question;
                    Z: Level of significance of the difference between the expected partial frequency and the observed partial frequency
   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395