Page 405 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 405

9781412934633-Chap-25  1/10/09  8:56 AM  Page 376





                   376               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   their  station. Hegemony, finally, as Belinda  based on hierarchy, exchange value and output
                   Bozzoli (1991: 2) has argued, is a process, a  quotas.
                   ‘moving equilibrium in which spaces are cre-  ‘Disoralia’ refers to a pressure, which
                   ated, fought for and won by those at the  arises, from the distortion of symbolic, lin-
                   bottom from those at the top’.          guistic and communicative interaction due to
                     Both domination and hegemony can exist  the command language and practical intent
                   at the institutional level: this school, this fac-  of organizational and civic life.
                   tory, that church; or can exist at the broadest  ‘Degendering’ refers to pressure on cus-
                   level: the state, between states, across empires.  tomary gender roles.
                     Fourth, social movements arise once the  All these pressures, acting in concert,
                   webs that connect rulers and ruled, the pow-  propel people to recoil from them and in that
                   erless and the powerful, get torn by crises, by  process group together with others to refract
                   violations of expectations, by manifold  their force and create communities of mean-
                   instances that might be intrinsic or extrinsic  ing and practices that regulate everyday life.
                   to the relationship. They sustain themselves  In this sense, one has to concur with Bozzoli
                   as movements by mobilizing the dissonance  that ‘consciousness [is] formed within and
                   and alterity that exists, and coordinate in new  against structures, rather than above and
                   ways the defensive combinations and cultural  around them’ (1991: 2).
                   formations that subsist in ordinary people’s  With this elaborate process of conceptual
                   lives.  They sustain themselves better if the  distinctions we can trace parameters of expe-
                   process of coordination involves the mobi-  rience and conflict, of accommodation and
                   lization of physical and symbolic resources.  resistance. We can also explore how a chal-
                   Through the latter they establish new relation-  lenge to managements and the apartheid state
                   ships and a counter-hegemony that begins to  subsisted within a ‘symbolic capital’ gener-
                   challenge dominant norms and institutions.  ated by ordinary black workers in Natal in
                     This should be distinguished from move-  the context of their struggles for workers’
                   ments of revaluation – a radical attempt to  rights, democracy and a new communitarian-
                   impose the imagined old norms.          ism. I argue that in the course of trade union
                     Finally, the crisis and collapse of cultural  mobilization, black workers used whatever
                   formations might lead to anomie, normless-  practical and emotive means they had at their
                   ness and despair.                       disposal to create a new language and many
                     Fifth, I would like to posit four related and  new images of resistance. In the process, a
                   yet distinct ‘pressures’ that are crucial in the  shifting and volatile ‘discursive formation’ of
                   genesis of cultural formations.  These are  class, nation, ethnicity and gendering has
                   ‘alienation’, ‘disvaluation’, ‘disoralia’ and  emerged which has helped the threading
                   ‘degendering’. I posit these as substitutes for  together of an importantly new ‘horizontal
                   Marx’s all encompassing concept of alien-  comradeship’.
                   ation or Durkheim’s 1984 anomie, as the   More specifically, approximately a thou-
                   defining psychopathologies of modern times.  sand of them participated in the making of
                     ‘Alienation’ still echoes Marx’s argument  plays, reviving oral traditions of perform-
                   that modern capitalism created a world in  ance, composed and sung, wrote and told sto-
                   which workers were alienated from the prod-  ries as an aspect of their self-definition. Their
                   uct of their labour and the work process  contribution in turn, has crafted many of
                   itself, which made them indifferent to the   the ways their co-workers understood
                   priorities of capital and created unique psy-  their consciousness-in-the-making. As many
                   chosocial pressures.                    of Natal’s workers crowded inside union
                     ‘Disvaluation’ refers to a pressure that  offices, halls and then, stadiums, they could
                   demands of people not reciprocal, morally  not but come to touch and be touched by the
                   grounded relationships but instrumental ones  cultural energies around them.
   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410