Page 151 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 151

140                   30 Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
                 Table  6.2  Effect  of  braid  angle  on  the  mechanical  properties  of  carbodepoxy,
                 Multilayer Interlock 3D braids (from Brookstein et al., 1993)
                 Materials         3D Braids                 2D Triaxial Braids
                 Lay-ups           ~k45~lO~l~45" ~60°10Q/k60"  ~45"10"1~k45~  k60"/O01*60"
                 Longitudinal tensile   316         192           3 67           133
                 strength (MPa)
                 Transverse tensile    156          338           250            309
                 strength (MPa)
                 Longitudinal tensile   32.6        26.7          33.7          26.6
                 modulus (GPa)
                 Transverse tensile    19.8         45.5          16.3          34.4
                 modulus (GPa)
                 Longitudinal          320          218           280            267
                 compressive strength
                 (MPa)
                 Transverse            183          207           201            248
                 compressive strength
                              -
                 (MPa)
                 Longitudinal          25.6         25.5          31.4          26.7
                 compressive modulus
                 (GPa)
                 Transverse            22.1         24.4          20.9          22.2
                 compressive modulus
                 (GPa)
                 CAI' strength         320          218           280            267
                 0 J/mm
                 CAI strength          203          214           202            190
                 3 Jlmm
                 CAI strength  -        195         182            177           183
                 7 J/mm
                  *CAI = Compression-after-impact


                 6.2.2 Influence of Braiding Process
                 The effect of  axial fibres upon the mechanical properties of  3D braids is also highly
                 relevant when comparing the properties of 3D braided composites produced by different
                 braiding processes.
                    There are three main processes that have been developed to  produce 3D braided
                  preforms (Cstep, 2-step and Multilayer Interlock) and the details of  these techniques
                  have been outlined in Chapter 2. It is possible to create axial yarns within the 4-step and
                 Multilayer Interlock processes but generally the 2-step process manufactures preforms
                  with a greater proportion of the available yams in an axial position. A comparison of
                  mechanical performance between specimens manufactured by  the different techniques
                  will therefore depend upon the relative amounts of axial and braiding yarns within each
                  specimen and the braiding angle, as both factors influence the mechanical properties.
                    There  is  little  data  in  the  published  literature  that  compares  the  mechanical
                  performance of 3D braided composites produced by different braiding processes. B yun
                  and  Chou  (1991a) compared  the  tensile,  compressive and  shear  performance of  E-
                  glass/epoxy braided  composites produced  by  the  2-step  and  4-step  processes.  The
                  details of the braid architectures and results of the mechanical tests are summarised in
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156