Page 186 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 186

Stitched Composites                        175
            Simple rule-of-mixtures theory can be used to explain the small improvements (< 10%)
            to the Young’s modulus and strength of stitched composites.  It is well known that the
            modulus and strength of composites are dependent on the volume fraction of in-plane
           fibres aligned in the load direction.  Stitching with a high tensile force on the yam so the
           thread is taut can raise the fibre volume content by several percent by compacting the
           preform.  The fibre volume fraction can  be  increased further by  compaction of  the
            stitched preform during consolidation inside a closed mould.  It has been suggested by
           Mouritz and Cox (2000) that any modest increase to the Young’s modulus and strength
           of stitched composites is probably due to a small increase in the fibre volume content
           due to compaction of the in-plane fibres by  stitching.  Unfortunately, however, most
           researchers who find an improvement to the mechanical properties of composites after
           stitching  do  not  report  the  fibre  volume  contents  for  the  stitched  and  unstitched
            materials.  Therefore, while  it  is  likely  that  compaction  is  the  cause  for  the  small
            improvements to modulus and strength, this has not been confirmed by experiment.
              A  few  stitched  composites  display  remarkably  high  mechanical  properties,
           particularly under flexural loading.  It is seen in Figure 8.8 that the flexural modulus and
           strength values for some stitched composites are up to 3.5  and  1.75 times higher than
           the  unstitched  laminate,  respectively.  Such  large  improvements  to  the  flexural
           properties  cannot  be  due  solely  to  fibre  compaction  from  stitching, which  usually
           increases the fibre volume content by a few percent.  The mechanism responsible for the
           large increase to the flexural properties of stitched composites has not been determined.
           However, a study by Chang et al. (1989) found that some unstitched composites fail in
           bending  by  delamination  cracking,  but  when  these  materials  are  stitched  the
           delamination cracks are suppressed and this increases the flexural properties.
              The reduction to the tensile modulus and strength of stitched composites is attributed
           mostly to three types of  damage caused by  stitching.  These are fibre breakage (see
           Figure 8.4a), distortion and crimping of the in-plane fibres causing misalignment from
           the load direction (see Figures 8.4b-8.4d). These types of damage are usually localised
           to a small region surrounding the stitches, and therefore their effect on the modulus and
           strength  is  expected  to  be  modest.  Because the  number  and  size  of  the  regions
           containing  misaligned  fibres  is  small, preliminary  modelling  by  Mouritz  and  Cox
           (2000) indicate that  the reduction to the Young’s modulus of  stitched composites is
           modest (usually less than about 5%).  This prediction shows reasonable agreement with
           the observed reduction of up to 20% in many stitched composites.
              The mechanism of compression failure of stitched composites is a complex process,
           and  is believed to be a competition between different failure modes.  Many types of
           unstitched  composites,  and  in  particular  prepreg  laminates,  fail  under  uniaxial
           compression loading by delamination cracking between the plies.  Delamination is the
           most common compression failure mechanism in unstitched materials, and it is often
           initiated  by  edge  stresses  or  a  pre-existing  defect  (such  as  a  void  or  crack).
           Delamination failure can be suppressed in stitched composites by the stitches stopping
           Euler buckling of the delaminated plies.  Farley et al. (1992a; 1992b; 1993c) observed
           that  with  delamination suppressed in  stitched  composites, the  compressive  failure
           mechanism changes to kinking of  the most severely crimped load-bearing fibres.  The
           damage mechanism leading to a kink failure is believed to start at the surface of stitched
           materials where the crimping of the fibres is the most severe (see Figure 8.4d).  Under
           compression loading, axial shear stresses rapidly rise in a heavily crimped fibre bundle,
            which  cause failure of  the polymer  matrix  within  the  bundle via  microcracking and
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191