Page 15 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 15

CHAPTER 1 History of Low-Salinity and Smart Waterflood  7

          drop. These observations imply the ability of CaCl 2  on the adsorption of organic material than a gradient in
          brine to change reservoir wettability toward more  the salinity. In coreflooding tests, production, salinity,
          oil-wet. Experiments using Middle Eastern sandstone  and effluent pH are monitored. The experimental
          cores are carried out to review the observations by  results indicate that LSWF causes a local increase in
          Lager et al. (2008) and reveal the main factor for  pH and the pH increases result in the desorption of
          LSWF. The core saturated with oil is flushed by forma-  organic components of crude oil from the clay. Based
          tion brine. The formation brine having TDS with  on the results, the salting-in mechanism is proposed
                                    þ
          238,000 mg/L is composed of Na with 84,300 mg/L,  for LSWF. Another study by RezaeiDoust, Puntervold,
          Ca 2þ  with 6800 mg/L, and Mg  2þ with 1215 mg/L. The  and Austad (2011) carried out further experiments to
          pure NaCl without CaCl 2 brines and NaCl with CaCl 2  verify the mechanism.
          brines are injected in to the core. The two pure NaCl  Nasralla and Nasr-El-Din (2014) investigated
          brines are designed with 2000 and 240,000 mg/L and  the LSWF with contact angle measurement, zeta (z)
          other brines have NaCl with 2000 mg/L and CaCl 2  potential measurement, and corefloodings of second-
          with 10 or 100 mg/L. The injection of pure NaCl with  ary and tertiary oil recoveries. Through the comprehen-
          2000 mg/L produces higher oil production rate as well  sive experiments, they tried to explain the reason of the
          as the lower level of differential pressure compared  improved oil recovery with EDL expansion. Various
          with the injections of other brines. Based on these  brines, which have TDS from 109 to 174,156 mg/L
          observations of sandstone cores, this study concluded  and pH from 4 to 7.6, are subject to the experiments.
          that a major contribution on the increasing oil recovery  The experiments measure the z-potentials of oil/brine
          is the ionic concentration of brine, i.e., ionic strength,  and Berea sandstone rock/brine interfaces by changing
          rather than the Ca 2þ  and Mg 2þ  and proposed the  brine type. The experimental results indicate that
          electrical double layer (EDL) expansion theory as a  z-potential of oil/brine is a function of salinity and
          mechanism of LSWF.                            cation type. In addition, it is found that lower pH
            Berg, Cense, Jansen, and Bakker (2010) carried out  produces the less negative and closer to zero z-poten-
          the experiments to find the direct evidence indicating  tial. The contact angle is measured to confirm the
          the exact mechanism of LSWF. They constructed exper-  wettability alteration by changing brine pH and
          imental system to visualize the microscopic detachment  salinity. It is also tried to quantify the relation between
          of crude oil from clay layer. The experiments monitor  the wettability modification and z-potential change
          the movement of oil droplets attached to montmoril-  and develop the relation with the results of LSWF cor-
          lonite clay layer as well as thickness of the layer, when  eflooding. In the test of the tertiary recovery of LSWF,
          salinity of injecting brine is changed from high salinity  no additional oil recovery and increasing pressure
          to low salinity. It is observed that approximately up to  drop due to fine migration are observed (Fig. 1.9A).
          80% of oil is released from the clay layer with the  However, the secondary recovery of LSWF increases
          minor swelling of the clay layer. It also reports no  oil recovery up to 12% than high-salinity brine
          deflocculation or release of clay particles. The study  injection (Fig. 1.9B). The another coreflooding of
          concluded that the LSWF increases oil recovery because  LSWF investigates the effects of salinity, brine compo-
          of wettability modification rather than fine migration  sition, and pH on the secondary oil recovery. From the
          and selective plugging via clay swelling.     experiments, the study concluded that the expansion
            Austad,  Rezaeidoust,  and  Puntervold  (2010)  of EDL is controlled by salinity and pH and it increases
          published the adsorption and coreflooding experiments  the secondary oil recovery when injecting brine has
          of LSWF to illustrate the effects of pH and salinity. The  lower salinity and higher pH. The additional study of
          adsorption measurement uses the kaolinite clay  Shehata and Nasr-El-Din (2017) carried out various
          powder, basic organic materials of quinoline, and acidic  experiments including spontaneous imbibition, core-
          organic material of 4-tert-butyl benzoic acid. The  flood, computed tomography (CT) scan, X-ray diffrac-
          adsorption of the organic materials on the clay power  tion (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning
          is measured in the various ranges of salinity and pH  electron microscope (SEM), nuclear magnetic reso-
          conditions. In the low pH condition of 5, the increasing  nance (NMR), and mercury injection capillary pressure
          adsorption is observed as salinity decreases. In the high  (MICP) tests. The extensive experiments intensively
          pH condition of 8, the sensitivity of adsorption to the  investigate the effect of connate water composition
          salinity depends on the salinity and the degree of  on the oil recovery of LSWF and observe that the diva-
          adsorption is relatively low (Fig. 1.8). This observation  lent cations in connate water significantly increase the
          implies that an increase in pH has much higher impact  oil recovery.
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20