Page 91 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 91

CHAPTER 4   Hybrid Chemical EOR Using Low-Salinity and Smart Waterflood  83


          on the oil recovery. This study proposed the two injec-  In addition, the placing pressure of PPG and fracture
          tion scenarios of coinjection of PPG and LSWF and suc-  width are investigated. The placing pressure of PPG indi-
          cessive injection of LSWF following PPG. The first  cates the maximum pressure to inject PPG for each exper-
          injection scenario is designed as pre- and postflush in-  iment. Both the PPG placing pressure and fracture width
          jection using 1% NaCl brine and various PPG injections  slightly or negligibly affect the oil recovery and residual
          with 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% NaCl brines. Firstly, in the  resistance factor.
          displacement tests using oil-wet carbonate rocks, the re-  Alhuraishawy and Bai (2017) published another
          sidual resistance factor of coinjection of LSWF and PPG  experiment of the first injection scenario, coinjection
          is evaluated by varying the salinity of gel solvent. The  of PPG, and LSWF. The microgel with mesh size of
          PPG with NaCl brine of 0.1% shows the highest resid-  20e30 is used for the PPG injection in this study. The
          ual resistance factor and that with NaCl brine of  light crude oil of 36 degrees API and oil-wet Indiana
          0.01% follows the next. The waterflood after the coin-  limestone are prepared for the displacement experi-
          jection scheme shows the higher injecting pressure  ments. Firstly, swelling ratio measurements calculate
          than the waterflood before the coinjection because of  the swelling ratio of the dry microgel varying the solvent
          the residual resistance factor by gel blocking. The sensi-  with different brines (1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% NaCl). The
          tivity of swelling ratio of PPG by salinity is observed.  swelling ratio is defined as the difference between the
          The low salinity condition relatively shows the higher  initial weight of dry microgel and the weight of fully
          resistance factor indicating higher gel swelling. Howev-  swollen gel divided by the initial weight of dry gel.
          er, there is an optimum salinity condition to maximize  The increasing swollen gel is visualized as salinity of
          the residual resistance factor. Next experiment investi-  brine decreases (Fig. 4.15). The various fractured
          gates the second scenario of hybrid process. It is
          designed to apply LSWF following PPG with 1.0%
          NaCl brine. The PPG with 1.0% NaCl solvent is fol-
          lowed by the 1% NaCl brine as postflush process. The
          residual resistance factor after the injection is estimated
          by 9.2. Successively, chasing waters of 0.1% NaCl brine
          and 0.01% NaCl brine are injected after the postflush.
          The residual resistance factor after the chasing LSWF
          using 0.1% NaCl brine increases up to 104, which indi-
          cates the low salinity condition reswells the gels.
          Despite high-saline gel solvent, the injection of low-
          salinity water significantly increases the residual resis-
          tance factor. The second chasing LSWF using 0.01%
          NaCl brine rises the residual resistance factor up to
          130. It is clear that low-salinity water injection as
          chasing water injection confidently improves the resis-
          tance factor of gel treatment regardless of salinity of
          gel solvent. The higher residual resistance factor of
          LSWF rises the injection pressures as well as oil recovery.
            To quantify the wettability modification effect during
          the hybrid process of low salinityeaugmented gel treat-
          ment, same displacement test using the water-wet rock
          is carried out. The comparison between the tests using
          oil-wet and water-wet rocks captures a couple of observa-
          tions. The injection of 1% NaCl brine after PPG injection
          produces higher residual resistance factor in the water-
          wet system than in the oil-wet system. However, the
          chasing water injection of 0.1% NaCl brine results in re-  FIG. 4.15 Increasing swollen gel with a decrease in salinity.
          sidual resistance factor of 42 for the water-wet rock and  (Credit: From Alhuraishawy, A. K., & Bai, B. (2017). Evaluation
          104 for the oil-wet rock. The chasing LSWF modifies the  of combined low-salinity water and microgel treatments to
          oil-wet rock toward strongly water-wetness, and it negli-  improve oil recovery using partial fractured carbonate
          gibly changes the wetness of water-wet rock, which is in  models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 158,
          line of preliminary spontaneous imbibition tests.  80e91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.016.)
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96