Page 195 - A Practical Companion to Reservoir Stimulation
P. 195

PRACTICAL COMPANION TO RESERVOIR STIMULATION




              Controlling the timing of the breaking process is critical to   fluid relative to its dimensionless position along the fracture,
            the  success of  the treatment.  Once a breaker  is added to a   based on fluid efficiency. Time- and temperature-dependent
            fracturing fluid, the degradation process immediately begins.   viscosity  values  can then  be  applied  to develop a breaker
            Careful planning  must go into the design of breaker sched-   schedule that maximizes  the amount of  breaker  used while
            ules. If too much breaker is added early in the treatment, the   never  allowing  the  fracturing  fluid  to  degrade  below  the
            viscosity required for fluid loss control and proppant transport   critical viscosity of  100 cp 170 sec-1.  Table P- 10 gives a hy-
            may  be  prematurely  lost,  resulting  in  a  screenout.  If  the   pothetical  treatment  schedule  using  a  40-lb  borate-cross-
            breaker  schedule  is  not  ambitious  enough,  the  molecular   linked  fracturing  fluid.  The tapered  breaker  schedule  was
            chains may not degrade sufficiently, causing the treatment to   calculated based on a fluid surface temperature of 80°F and a
            clean up slowly. Even worse,  the fluid may not completely   bottomhole  temperature  of  150°F. The  pad  fluid  will  be
            degrade without  sufficient breaker  quantities,  limiting  well   exposed to bottomhole temperature for more than 1 hr so only
           production because of proppant-conductivity damage. This is   a minimal amount of breaker can be added. The last proppant
            particularly true at high polymer concentrations. As the poly-   stage is exposed to bottomhole temperatures for less than 10
            mer concentration  increases,  higher breaker  concentrations   min, allowing the breaker concentration to be very aggressive
            must be maintained to sufficiently degrade the polymer and   for this one stage.
            prevent proppant-permeability  damage. It is now recognized   Breakers  for oil-base gels operate much differently than
            that  the  in-situ  polymer  concentration  in  the  fracture  may   their  water-base  counterparts.  Most  gelled  oil breakers  are
            increase more than tenfold (concentrations  greater than 500   slowly  dissolving  bases,  such  as  lime  or bicarbonate,  and
            lb/lOOO gal) because of fluid loss. The breaker level  in this   they are intended to reverse the crosslinking reaction. These
            concentrated  fracturing  fluid decreases as the polymer  con-   systems work  quite well  at temperatures  above  150°F, but
            centration increases. The breaker is dissolved into the water   large quantities of breaker are required at lower temperatures.
            portion of the slurry and is lost in the fluid leaking off as the   The low-temperature  break mechanism  is not precise and is
            fracturing fluid dehydrates. This can result in a damage to the   often expensive because of the quantity  of breaker needed.
            proppant pack, which may exceed 90%.                 Amine systems can also be used in gelled oil systems to aid in
              Tapered breaker schedules allow much greater quantities   the break process at low temperatures.
            of breaker to be added to the fluid while minimizing the risk   Ideally, a breaker would not become active until after the
            of excessive degradation. To design the breaker schedule, the   treatment has finished  and the formation  has closed on the
            time of exposure to bottomhole temperature for each stage of   proppant. The ideal breaker would then completely degrade
            the  fracture  treatment  must  be  determined.  From  this,  a   the polymer in a very short period of time, and the fracturing
            maximum  quantity  of  breaker  can  be  calculated  without   fluid could be produced back. Recent advances in encapsula-
            risking premature loss of viscosity. This can best be demon-   tion technology  have allowed  the development  of  breakers
            strated through the following example: Table P-9 gives vis-   that  perform  in  a similar  manner.  Even  though  the current
            cosity data for a borate fracturing fluid with breaker included.   techniques  are  not  perfected,  they  do  allow  significantly
            The table shows how time, temperature and breaker concen-   higher concentrations  of oxidative breaker to be placed into
            tration contribute to the viscosity degradation of a fluid. The   fracturing fluids without sacrificing viscosity (see Fig. P-44).
            temperature  of  the  fracturing  fluid  along  the  fracture  will   These breakers also have the advantage of remaining with the
            vary  significantly  as a result  of  cool-down effects.  Figure   polymer inside the fracture. Once encapsulated, the breaker
            P-43 can be used to estimate the temperature of a fracturing   is large enough that it will not be lost during fluid leakoff.
























            P-36
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200