Page 136 - Accelerating out of the Great Recession
P. 136

GO ON THE OFFENSIVE


        Invest in R&D and Accelerate Product Development


        During the Great Depression, R&D spending dropped signifi-
        cantly. But we find a consistent pattern in our research: compa-
        nies like IBM that were able to sustain investment in R&D cre-
        ated enduring advantage. It is also true that downturn
        investments are often of better value, with less competition for
        scarce resources not only keeping costs down but also increas-
        ing availability. Playing catch-up with a company that contin-
        ues to invest through difficult times is extremely difficult.
           In the years before the Great Depression, the U.S. chemical
        industry had experienced a period of innovation and success.
        Much of that success continued through the 1930s, with the
        industry still remaining profitable despite a sharp drop in rev-
        enues. However, DuPont significantly outperformed the indus-
        try. The company’s profits increased by 60 percent between 1929
        and 1937, with its share of the profits of the chemical industry
        increasing from 20 percent to 32 percent over the same period.
        Rather than follow convention and cut back R&D in response
        to the Great Depression, DuPont expanded, recognizing that
        increasing investment in R&D could open up an innovation gap
        over its competitors. It adopted a policy of cost “refinement, not
        retrenchment,” assessing research on the basis of its potential to
                                                      1
        deliver marketable products in a short time frame. This practi-
        cal commitment to rapid development cycles and the prioritiza-
        tion of investment that can yield quick returns are features of
        many successful innovators in difficult economic times.
           DuPont used the downturn as an opportunity to take a hard
        look at its research programs, eliminating those that had little
        chance of success and increasing R&D spending on others with
        greater potential. The struggling ammonia division, for example,



                                 ■  115  ■
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141