Page 12 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 12

1. INTRODUCTION                                 3

           processing, and interpretation stages (Fig. 1.2).  stacking, as well as subsequent migration
           Data acquisition parameters generally strongly  steps, etc.
           affect the structure of the processing flows as  On the other hand, even these primary pro-
           well as the parameters of each processing step  cesses strongly need some important prerequi-
           in the flow. For instance, depths of the seismic  sites. For instance, deconvolution requires a
           streamer or gun array play the most important  normal incidence stationary minimum phase
           role in the frequency content of marine seismic  wavelet, as well as a noise-free reflectivity
           data. If a wider frequency band with relatively  series. While an accurate stacking in 2D seismic
           higher frequency content is required, then the  data needs perfect hyperbolic reflection curves
           streamer and/or gun array must be towed at   on common depth point (CDP) gathers, 2D
           shallower depths. This situation also controls  poststack time migration algorithms need
           the band-pass filter cut-off frequency values  zero-offset sections consisting of only primary
           during the processing steps later on.        reflections generated by wave fields in-plane
              Yılmaz (2001) defines the primary steps of the  to the seismic survey. Today, stacking itself is
           processing as (i) deconvolution, (ii) stacking,  the most effective noise-suppression method
           and (iii) migration (Fig. 1.2). Other processing  that significantly removes both random and
           steps can substantially be considered as contrib-  coherent noise, such as multiple reflections.
           utory methods used to prepare suitable inputs  This process, however, produces a stack sec-
           for these three major processing steps, to   tion, but the oil and gas industry also needs
           increase their efficiency. For instance, almost  noise-free prestack seismic data in order to ana-
           all of the preprocessing steps are used to prepare  lyze amplitude versus offset (AVO) anomalies,
           a noise-free input to deconvolution; velocity  which may indicate possible hydrocarbon res-
           analysis is needed to obtain velocities as input  ervoirs. Likewise, seismic data as clean as pos-
           to normal moveout (NMO) correction and then  sible is also required for some other prestack




                                             Seismic reflection work



                        Data      Raw data            Data             Image     Seismic
                      acquisition                  processing                  interpretation



                                  Decon              Stack             Migration


                                                                                        QC
                            -1-                       -2-                      -3-
                    Selection of flow and data  Selection of data processing   Evaluation of the outputs of
                     processing steps most    parameters that are most   each processing step,
                     suitable for the input raw  suitable for each processing  removal of parameter
                         seismic data                 step                 selection issues

           FIG. 1.2  Basic stages of a conventional seismic reflection project, consisting of data acquisition, processing and interpre-
           tation, and primary steps of data processing along with the quality control (QC) recurrence in processing.
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17